All Forum Comments
Comment by amilner posted on Lenses for an SFX-N at 05/02/2006 - 20:29
Comment by amilner posted on MZ-S Continued... at 12/01/2006 - 10:13
Comment by amilner posted on Going wide at 18/12/2005 - 15:40
I believe there are some issues with (considerably) older electronic flash guns because the voltages are higher and there is apparently a risk of damage to the camera electronics.
Comment by amilner posted on z-1 flash question... at 17/12/2005 - 09:04
JPEG on 1 GB - about 300 at highest quality
You don't need the latest firmware to use RAW - just use the quality setting in the shooting menu (the options are 1 2 or 3* or RAW)
If you are going to switch to RAW you may want to get a 3rd party conversion program - the PENTAX one is not very good. I use Capture 1 LE
It is woorth getting the firmware update - it gives the option of continuous AF in the manual and semi automatic modes. It also gives an auto ASA option and an option to use the ML button in manual as a one off Av, Tv or P setting (depending on the option you have chosen in the menu)
Comment by amilner posted on JPEG/PEF Muddle at 19/12/2005 - 10:42
However the test did not look at the light fastness of the 3rd party inks, so caveat emptor. I've got some to try out but have not switched over yet.
Note the Canon tanks are just tanks, whereas the Epson tanks include the print head, and that is what makes the Epson tanks more expensive.
Comment by amilner posted on New Printer at 30/11/2005 - 15:26
Comment by amilner posted on New Printer at 30/11/2005 - 12:05
(a) http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Pentax-A-SMC-50mm-Lens-1-1-4_W0QQitemZ7566809414QQcategoryZ4688QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem (for info - I was just browsing)
(b) I was my fault - sorry - I revived an old thread when talking about the 16-45
Comment by amilner posted on Fast fifties - info please! at 26/11/2005 - 09:29
Calling them circular polarisers is a bit confusing and not an acurate description of what they do.
Comment by amilner posted on Circular vs Linear Polarizing Filters at 18/11/2005 - 10:08
I had heard that Olympus angle finders fit Pentax 'M' finders. Can anyone confirm this?
(Just had a pleasant afternoon wandering round a village with MX, 40/2.8 and Delta 400)
Comment by amilner posted on Angle finders at 17/11/2005 - 20:59


The oldest (SMC, SMC M) will work in manual and aperture priority mode, manual focus
SMC A will work in all exposure modes, manual focus
SMC F & FA and FA D will work in all modes, manual and autofocus
SMC FA J don't have an aperture ring and so can only really be used in program or shutter priority modes, auto or manual focus
SMC DA will work as FA J but will vignette (dark corners) at some focal lengths because they are designed for the smaller sensor of the digital cameras
AL just indicates the use of aspherical elements in the lens - it has nothing to do with lens compatibility