All Forum Comments
Comment by amilner posted on Angle finders at 16/11/2005 - 18:12
Comment by amilner posted on Hot Shoe Grip/MZ-S/+ AF400FTZ or AF500FTZ or AF280T dilemma at 04/11/2005 - 13:10
Is a stop a significant issue for exposure? I would say so - so if metering externally for (e.g.) the 28-105 it might well be an idea to compensate by 1/2 a stop to 1 stop depending on the zoom setting.
Comment by amilner posted on Why not a 50-135mm zoom lens? at 26/10/2005 - 17:22
Of course FAJ and DA lenses are constant aperture as they have no aperture ringand the aperture has to be set from the body. Some do have a variable maximum aperture of course.
Comment by amilner posted on Why not a 50-135mm zoom lens? at 26/10/2005 - 15:49
The relative aperture (or f number) of the lens is the aperture divided by its focal length.
Zoom lenses are mostly variable aperture. If you look into the front of a zoom lens the apparent size of the hole changes as you zoom (due to optical effects), but usually not as much as the focal length changes and so the relative aperture (f number) changes with focal length. AFAIK most variable aperture zooms are nomally variable at all apertures, not just maximum.
Constant aperture zooms compensate by mechanically linking the iris to the zoom action - effectively reducing the maximum aperture for shorter focal lenghths. This makes them more complex and usually more expensive but easier to use with external metering.
Of course if you adjust the aperture from the body (rather than the aperture ring) the electronics compensates and keeps the relative aperture constant as you zoom.
Comment by amilner posted on Why not a 50-135mm zoom lens? at 26/10/2005 - 12:10
Comment by amilner posted on Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 verus Sigma 170-500mm f4.5-5.6 at 24/10/2005 - 11:12
AF it would be my MZ6 with the 28-105 (not quite the range of the 24-135, which I no longer have, but much much lighter!)
Once when I was traveling really light I left all my SLR kit behind and carried just an Olympus XA. Five weeks, eight rolls of Sensia 100 (I was being careful with film as well) and some wonerful pics - see
www.dabnet.org/camino
Comment by amilner posted on The Bare Bones at 24/10/2005 - 00:13
Comment by amilner posted on *ist DL and Xtra Flash at 08/10/2005 - 16:46
(very short answer but I can't think of anything to add!)
Comment by amilner posted on Fast Street Shooting with a Pentax DSLR at 08/10/2005 - 16:40
Flashes designed for the manual bodies (without an F after the number) use the analogue protocol (e.g. AF280T, AF400T) offer TTL on all TTL bodies (including 645 and the 67II). Digital flashes do not have an analogue command mode (such as the AF400FTZ) will only offer TTL on AF bodies (including the AF 645. Not sure about the 67II but I suspect it has the digital protocol)
This makes the AF280T quite a useful acquisition and at c. £50 secondhand quite a bargain. And unlike the otherwise excellent AF360FGZ it has a swivel head.
Comment by amilner posted on AF 500 FTZ and Super A at 30/09/2005 - 18:37


http://stores.ebay.co.uk/VirtualVillage_W0QQssPageNameZVIStoreHeaderLinksQQtZkm?
The finder is described as C***n/N***n but in fact includes an adapter for M series finders. Made by Seagul & shipped from China - I don't know what the quality is like but it is a lot cheaper than the Pentax option.
Anybody know anything about it?