Algernon

Joined: 22nd May 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Algernon
It's the old 'Computer Fair' con where they sell SH priced goods
that have been tested and then have boxes marked untested
at about 10-20% of the marked price.... in seller speak......
Untested means failed the test and you should buy based
on what you consider a broken/non-working item is worth

Comment by Algernon posted on A K1000 for 10,000 at 17/02/2012 - 14:56

Algernon
You might find this thread of interest link

It contains a link to Gregmolls setup on Flickr also on this
site somewhere?

Comment by Algernon posted on Old Slides at 17/02/2012 - 11:32

Algernon
The low light performance of the K-5 is amazing it works in light
that K20D could only manage to produce very grainy shots

This was taken in the kitchen late in the day with just windowlight
(about 8ft away) and a small bulb on a wall fitting. I had to rely on
the green/beep indicator for focus confirmation the light was that bad.

f/2 at 1/5th 100ISO that's poor even for room lighting, but the
K-5 can handle it OK

Comment Image


K-5 with Tomioka 55mm f/1.2 lens
at f/2 x 1/5th sec. Tripod.
Available light. Dark January 2:30pm
Straight from camera Jpeg slight crop/sharpen.
AWB

RAW would allow more highlight/shadow preservation.

Comment by Algernon posted on Upgrading from K20D to K5 - is it really worth it? at 17/02/2012 - 09:17

Algernon
Pentaxophile wrote:
greynolds999 wrote:
And just to add, there is nothing like the feeling of taking out a roll of film and looking at the negatives. It gives you far more pleasure than downloading from a memory card.
Just remember to develop them first!
It's OK to take the film out if you just want to look at the perforations!

Comment by Algernon posted on Film processing for an idiot at 16/02/2012 - 13:31

Algernon
dinneenp wrote:
One more...
Wow! that's weird!

Comment by Algernon posted on Another pointless thread at 16/02/2012 - 13:27

Algernon
Just tried a K-5 battery in a K10D cover... it does fit but
springs off possibly due to the valley part that goes between the
AA effect cells. Probably be OK if this was cut off?

Edit: Yep! Took about a minute with an X-Acto
knife... I left some of the curved valley bits in so
that it springs against the K-5 battery. There's no
positive/active clip holding it on, but it should stay
on OK. I might put a small piece of masking tape on it
to be sure

It can still be used on the K10D battery as well.

Comment by Algernon posted on Plastic Batter Cover at 16/02/2012 - 12:57

Algernon
Clever stuff Bernard now get set up with a wholesaler

Doesn't the K10D plastic holder fit the K-5 battery?

Comment by Algernon posted on Plastic Batter Cover at 16/02/2012 - 10:20

Algernon
womble wrote:
If you are using the 67II on a tripod always lock the mirror up. It makes quite a difference...

K.
I would imagine it would! .... when you
can't see what your photographing!

Comment by Algernon posted on Pentax 67 II tripod at 15/02/2012 - 19:03

Algernon
He's only come back to try out the K-01

Welcome the the K-01 World!

Comment by Algernon posted on Can I come Home Please??? at 15/02/2012 - 19:01

Algernon
Just looked at that lousy site:

The Pentax K-01 has 872 comments in the News announcements
the Nikon D800 has 288 comments in the same section
"
Maybe all the Pentax comments crashed the system

Pentax link

Nikon link

=============================
Of course without even handling a K-01 they went
straight into the negative:

"Our biggest concern, based on its dependance on
contrast detection autofocus, is the camera's focus
speed. Most lenses designed for DSLR-style
phase-detection autofocus don't lend themselves
to the rapid contrast detection autofocus required
by mirrorless cameras."


BAH!!

Comment by Algernon posted on What's missing here? at 14/02/2012 - 16:44

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo