What's missing here?
Posted 14/02/2012 - 07:54
Link
That's a pretty awful Canikon site that's also very slow and
got a poorly designed user interface. Why any Pentaxian
would go there I can't imagine. Just look at how many K-01
posts there have been on the US forum plus the other sites
mostly linked from Ricehighs site.
You seem to get a kick out of posting anything negative you
can find about Pentax. You might as well not bother because
I don't think anyone else is
got a poorly designed user interface. Why any Pentaxian
would go there I can't imagine. Just look at how many K-01
posts there have been on the US forum plus the other sites
mostly linked from Ricehighs site.
You seem to get a kick out of posting anything negative you
can find about Pentax. You might as well not bother because
I don't think anyone else is
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 14/02/2012 - 09:43
Link
Algernon wrote:
You seem to get a kick out of posting anything negative you can find about Pentax. You might as well not bother because I don't think anyone else is
It's odd how different people draw different conclusions from information.You seem to get a kick out of posting anything negative you can find about Pentax. You might as well not bother because I don't think anyone else is
"So regardless of all of the hype over the K-01, it does not seem to be of interest to those that frequent DPR". . .which may indicate that your correct when you say DPR is a Canikon site.
Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Posted 14/02/2012 - 10:31
Link
OK Gary there seems to be a bit of confusion
I remember someone posting something about lens tests on that
site and the Canon ones were tweaked to show them in a better
light The site's now owned by Amazon so depending on
who's actually managing it there might be less bias. It's
still a really horrible slow interface and links to it aren't
allowed on the Pentax US forum
I remember someone posting something about lens tests on that
site and the Canon ones were tweaked to show them in a better
light The site's now owned by Amazon so depending on
who's actually managing it there might be less bias. It's
still a really horrible slow interface and links to it aren't
allowed on the Pentax US forum
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 14/02/2012 - 12:16
Link
Depressing Review has never been Pentax friendly. It used to be run by someone who was notorious for giving Pentax a terrible review no matter what - even when his tests proved otherwise in comparisons Pentax always came out worst in his conclusions.
I have no idea what it is like nowadays. I have long since given up on it.
I have no idea what it is like nowadays. I have long since given up on it.
Posted 14/02/2012 - 13:04
Link
I've always consulted dpreview on prospective camera purchases (among other sources of course), and always ended up getting/remaining with Pentax, so they can't be that biased. The istDL2 was 'recommended' and I remember it's viewfinder and build quality being praised. The K200D was 'highly recommended if you shoot RAW' and the K7 was 'highly recommended' - I quote
Quote:
The final word
The Pentax K-7 manages to combine superb build quality, comprehensive customization options, excellent ergonomics and an extensive feature set with (for a camera in this class) very compact dimensions. This makes it a more than viable alternative for those (but not only for those) who like to work with semi-pro equipment that still leaves some space in the gear bag. JPEG output at high sensitivities is not quite on the same level as some of the competitors but if you revert to shooting RAW things are pretty much evened out.
I mean, that sounds really positive to me! It had me sold anyway...
The final word
The Pentax K-7 manages to combine superb build quality, comprehensive customization options, excellent ergonomics and an extensive feature set with (for a camera in this class) very compact dimensions. This makes it a more than viable alternative for those (but not only for those) who like to work with semi-pro equipment that still leaves some space in the gear bag. JPEG output at high sensitivities is not quite on the same level as some of the competitors but if you revert to shooting RAW things are pretty much evened out.
Posted 14/02/2012 - 13:35
Link
I think the Pentax USA forum was formed due a fallout with DP
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 14/02/2012 - 16:44
Link
Just looked at that lousy site:
The Pentax K-01 has 872 comments in the News announcements
the Nikon D800 has 288 comments in the same section
"
Maybe all the Pentax comments crashed the system
Pentax link
Nikon link
=============================
Of course without even handling a K-01 they went
straight into the negative:
"Our biggest concern, based on its dependance on
contrast detection autofocus, is the camera's focus
speed. Most lenses designed for DSLR-style
phase-detection autofocus don't lend themselves
to the rapid contrast detection autofocus required
by mirrorless cameras."
BAH!!
The Pentax K-01 has 872 comments in the News announcements
the Nikon D800 has 288 comments in the same section
"
Maybe all the Pentax comments crashed the system
Pentax link
Nikon link
=============================
Of course without even handling a K-01 they went
straight into the negative:
"Our biggest concern, based on its dependance on
contrast detection autofocus, is the camera's focus
speed. Most lenses designed for DSLR-style
phase-detection autofocus don't lend themselves
to the rapid contrast detection autofocus required
by mirrorless cameras."
BAH!!
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 15/02/2012 - 03:14
Link
Algernon wrote:
You seem to get a kick out of posting anything negative you
can find about Pentax. You might as well not bother because
I don't think anyone else is
K10D owns more than one brand, but is far from being anti-Pentax. I suspect if there were a 135-format Pentax and one or two longer lenses, he might give up his blunderbuss (I mean his cannon) entirely.You seem to get a kick out of posting anything negative you
can find about Pentax. You might as well not bother because
I don't think anyone else is
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6417 posts
17 years
Nikon D800 12.8%
Olympus OM-D E-M5 9.9%
Canon PowerShot G1 X 3.9%
Fujifilm X-Pro1 3.3%
Canon PowerShot S100 2.3%
Sony Alpha NEX-7 1.8%
Nikon D7000 1.6%
Canon EOS 600D 1.5%
Sony Alpha NEX-5N 1.4%
Nikon D5100 1.4%
Also of note is that there is only one Canon DSLR in the list.
So regardless of all of the hype over the K-01, it does not seem to be of interest to those that frequent DPR.
Best regards