What has happened?

Gravelrash
Posted 26/05/2014 - 20:51 Link
So anyway David...is Storm your name or just the effect you have on forums?
Steve

Sometimes I'm serious and sometimes not, but I consider sarcasm an artform. Which is it today?
davidstorm
Posted 26/05/2014 - 20:53 Link
Gravelrash wrote:
So anyway David...is Storm your name or just the effect you have on forums?
It's my real name! I don't know about a 'Storm' on the Forum, I think this thread has been very healthy and great fun too.

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
dougf8
Posted 26/05/2014 - 21:02 Link
McGregNi wrote:
Yes, buy the measure of dougf8's post above, then maybe I shouldn't have posted some of my countryside pics .. on the basis that some (thats a tiny minority right, just a few people here and there, not even significant statistically, not even an amount that would fall into the usual survey's margin of error) might find them a teeny weeny bit, that's just a very little amount boring dull & mediocre ... (not many at all) .... But then we'd all have missed out on so much fun, excellent all-round quality photo-taking expertise and general good advice ... not to mention learned nothing of the scenic delights on offer near to the Croydon-Surrey borders.
Nobody has to post a comment and nobody has to feedback. No binding obligation, Did you miss that bit?

However if you want something a bit more than an anodyne comment, perhaps thinking a little and explaining what you tried or did or thought, would help.

Equally if you post an image you are leaving the door open to feedback whether you want it or not. Most people would rather say nothing than say anything bad , negative, condescending or demoralising.

Do you really want feedback on those images? Or can you do it yourself? You don't need me to tell you anything about them at all.
Lurking is shirking.!
Edited by dougf8: 26/05/2014 - 21:05
cabstar
Posted 26/05/2014 - 21:06 Link
MattyH wrote:
The percentage of professional photographers on this forum is tiny, lets say 1% which is about the same percentage as professionals using a Pentax as their main camera worldwide.

So with that in mind I think we could close down the your photos section of this forum and start a new one called, What I dislike about you and your photos, now I am guessing that could become quite active

You got to love this forum
I think this forum probably has a higher number of pro togs compared to other brand specific forums.

I also think the wide variety of subjects on this forum has inspired me to broaden my subjects. I have started to shoot birds nothing exotic but really appreciate the skill involved in that subject now.

I hope the stuff I have posted over the years here has also inspired and that I think is the main point of any forum like this, photography
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography

Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
ChrisA
Posted 26/05/2014 - 22:54 Link
johnriley wrote:
....I saw a forum somewhere that specified that anyone posting images must comment on other images. My feeling was that many people would simply not bother having read that stipulation.
Well there we are. Our difference in a nutshell.

How can anyone be so selfish as to expect that others should comment on their pictures, without being prepared to offer something in return?

I can understand fragile individuals being initially intimidated, but that's where it's important to reassure the novices - the emotional impact another's image has on them is just as valid as someone else's has on those that have been round the block many times.

And in some cases, more so.

I can imagine a horrible parallel universe, where the moderators kept count of images posted against comments offered. And then banned those that didn't meet some equation's requirements.

Only a fool would imagine that such was being advocated here. But that is a world apart from encouraging even beginners to believe that their naïve impressions are just as valid and often more interesting than the jaundiced views of those that have seen it all before.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
davidstorm
Posted 26/05/2014 - 23:42 Link
cabstar wrote:
I also think the wide variety of subjects on this forum has inspired me to broaden my subjects. I have started to shoot birds nothing exotic but really appreciate the skill involved in that subject now.

I hope the stuff I have posted over the years here has also inspired and that I think is the main point of any forum like this, photography
I agree with this Gary and I have certainly been inspired by your images. We do see a broad range and although I certainly don't feel qualified to give an informed opinion on all the images, I do try at least to give an opinion as often as I can, as do many others.

I think this particular thread has sparked more comment in other threads, which can only be a good thing for the Forum.

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
dougf8
Posted 09/06/2014 - 12:51 Link
Some of the more modern sites I use, actually rate the quality of posts and hence the worth of their members. It would be nice for some regular contributors to be recognised. People who post excellent images, provide decent c&c, provide technical solutions etc etc DrO, Smeggy, Mike P, for example and a whole load more folks too... I. E. The people who CREATE FORUM CONTENT.

It would help encourage useful contribution and deter delusional contribution and brash vacuous lickspittling.

You don't get decent content from lurkers!
Lurking is shirking.!
Edited by dougf8: 09/06/2014 - 12:55
Gravelrash
Posted 09/06/2014 - 13:23 Link
dougf8 wrote:
It would help encourage useful contribution and deter delusional contribution and brash vacuous lickspittling.
Well if you'll show me the door I'll grab my bag
Steve

Sometimes I'm serious and sometimes not, but I consider sarcasm an artform. Which is it today?
dougf8
Posted 09/06/2014 - 13:28 Link
Gravelrash wrote:
dougf8 wrote:
It would help encourage useful contribution and deter delusional contribution and brash vacuous lickspittling.
Well if you'll show me the door I'll grab my bag
I was being realistic so used the word deter!
Lurking is shirking.!
johnriley
Posted 09/06/2014 - 13:28 Link
What a dreadful concept, having our posts rated and having us put into a pecking order of usefulness....

Pentax User is about everybody being welcome, not just a select few.
Best regards, John
dougf8
Posted 09/06/2014 - 13:39 Link
johnriley wrote:
What a dreadful concept, having our posts rated and having us put into a pecking order of usefulness....

Pentax User is about everybody being welcome, not just a select few.
Modern, vibrant forums, where everyone is welcome.

Do you need examples of modern vibrant forums?
Lurking is shirking.!
Gravelrash
Posted 09/06/2014 - 13:47 Link
I don't think your previous post alluded to "everyone is welcome"
Steve

Sometimes I'm serious and sometimes not, but I consider sarcasm an artform. Which is it today?
tyronet2000
Posted 09/06/2014 - 14:04 Link
We are all equal and some are more equal than others
Regards
Stan

PPG
RayB
Posted 09/06/2014 - 15:13 Link
Post rating, karma points...

Apart from over-zealous modding, these are the two quickest ways to drive a forum into the ground...
dougf8
Posted 09/06/2014 - 22:29 Link
Well now, the concept of a "like" seems to work quite well elsewhere. Hmmm Facebook for one?

Another forum allows "visitor likes". You don't need to log in allowing guests and lurkers to participate in their appreciation of the "content providers". Logged in users also can like and their likes are logged against their id's.

Another site allows you to like posts from other users. It makes you feel loved.

Here we allow the OP to like posts in their thread but there is no way for users to like the post, other posts, threads, etc etc....

I see comments such as "300 views and no comments ,....." A disheartened member opening themselves by posting their images to a great big fat zero.

I'm surprised it threatens people the idea that they might get encouragement. I'm hardly on the bleeding edge of tech but we do seem to have great inertia here, highly conservative in many ways.

I need to get my post count down to single figures a month, I feel the lower the post count the more important the post must be, so I'm going to try not to post for 20 years, I wonder if anything will change?
Lurking is shirking.!
Edited by dougf8: 09/06/2014 - 22:32

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo