SRS new prices

Anvh
Posted 22/06/2009 - 15:27 Link
MattMatic wrote:
Stefan, ParkCameras have the DA*50-135 listed as £529. However, they probably have older stock.
I guess that may be the same for the sources you quote in the Netherlands as well

Matt
Don't seem like it and I don't hear any news about price raises on the Dutch forum.
here is an selection of shops link
And these priceses haven't changed since 3 months ago when I bought my DA*50-135 from SRS
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
MarkD
Posted 22/06/2009 - 15:40 Link
I think most of it is currency related. Last year £1 got you 245Yen now it's about 145Yen. That's a big hit. I think the Yen is artificially high at the moment as most other currencies are slowly creeping back towards where they were a year ago. I think the Yen will have to come down with a bump soon. Not that it helps us, and ,historically, when prices go up they usually stay up! Especially if stock has been bought at the higher prices.
.........all the gear, no idea!
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)
MattMatic
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:04 Link
Quote:
Last year £1 got you 245Yen now it's about 145Yen
Yikes! That's a huge difference
Matt
http://www.mattmatic.co.uk
(For gallery, tips and links)
Shaky
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:05 Link
MattMatic wrote:
Though there are price rises on the other brands as well - but from what I've seen they look like just currency price rises.

The Pentax rises just seem completely and utterly absurd
Yup, clearly currency movements are a factor but in no way does this explain the total magnitude of the price hikes.

In my view there are two possible additional explanations that I have alluded to in past posts.

1) Pentax marketing whizz-kids have adjudged the K7 to be so attractive that hoards of semi-pro photographers will be beating a path from other brand allegiances to buy it with associated lens goodies no matter what the price

2) Pentax have been told by Hoya in no uncertain terms that they better get the buisness profitable sharpish or else it's curtains, and having failed to attract the requisite customer base with a cheapo pricing strategy have no choice other than jack 'em up and pray that sales volumes don't decline too precipitously.

Personally I think the reason is #2, with future highly negative attendant implications for second hand prices if Pentax folds, as I now believe is highly likely.

There are new Nikon product announcements expected within the next few month that I am now awaiting with great interest. . .
Mannesty
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:13 Link
Shaky wrote:


2) Pentax have been told by Hoya in no uncertain terms that they better get the business profitable sharpish or else it's curtains, and having failed to attract the requisite customer base with a cheapo pricing strategy . . .
Where did this information come from ?
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Shaky
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:17 Link
Mannesty wrote:
Shaky wrote:


2) Pentax have been told by Hoya in no uncertain terms that they better get the business profitable sharpish or else it's curtains, and having failed to attract the requisite customer base with a cheapo pricing strategy . . .
Where did this information come from ?
Shaky wrote:
In my view
Gwyn
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:22 Link
Stefan K'berg also have it for a similar price, €719. They have the 60-250 for €1089. CameraNu is slightly cheaper on that one.

Shaky, good to see the "Pentax will fold soon" school of thought is still alive and well .
Shaky
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:26 Link
Gwyn wrote:
Shaky, good to see the "Pentax will fold soon" school of thought is still alive and well .
One thing is certain, Gwyn: It is not sustainable for Hoya to run Pentax as a charity.
loskeran
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:37 Link
Here we go again, "doom and gloom".
That is why Pentax will be bringing out a medium format digital body in the near future, who said Pentax were finnished.
Gwyn
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:45 Link
Shaky wrote:
Gwyn wrote:
Shaky, good to see the "Pentax will fold soon" school of thought is still alive and well .
One thing is certain, Gwyn: It is not sustainable for Hoya to run Pentax as a charity.
But who says they are? Do you have figures to support this theory?. Don't bother answering - we will go too far off topic.
Mannesty
Posted 22/06/2009 - 16:58 Link
Shaky wrote:
Mannesty wrote:
Shaky wrote:


2) Pentax have been told by Hoya in no uncertain terms that they better get the business profitable sharpish or else it's curtains, and having failed to attract the requisite customer base with a cheapo pricing strategy . . .
Where did this information come from ?
Shaky wrote:
In my view
So it's rumour, not fact?
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Shaky
Posted 22/06/2009 - 17:05 Link
Gwyn wrote:
Do you have figures to support this theory?
What frankly concerns me more than a little is I am fairly certain I have seen you in the past discussing Hoya's financial statements.

That being the case you would know Hoya do not break out separate *figures* for the Pentax camera operations. However, during the time I have paid attention they have invariably described this qualitatively as loss making, even on a quarterly basis.

You are not trying to set me up with a dishonest straw-man argument here are you?
Shaky
Posted 22/06/2009 - 17:09 Link
Mannesty wrote:
Shaky wrote:
Mannesty wrote:
[quote:3496ace15f="Shaky"]

2) Pentax have been told by Hoya in no uncertain terms that they better get the business profitable sharpish or else it's curtains, and having failed to attract the requisite customer base with a cheapo pricing strategy . . .
Where did this information come from ?
Shaky wrote:
In my view
So it's rumour, not fact?[/quote]It is my analysis/speculation, nothing more, nothing less; I thought that was perfectly clear in the first place

People should try to decide for themselves whether it is informed or not, cognitive dissonance notwithstanding.
Mike-P
Posted 22/06/2009 - 17:09 Link
£450 is frankly a stupid price for a 50mm f1.4, especially when you haven't got a f1.7 or 1.8 to sell instead. It's normally the cheapest lens in the range and usually the first one any new user goes for.
Mike-P
Posted 22/06/2009 - 17:11 Link
Shaky wrote:


People should try to decide for themselves whether it is informed or not, cognitive dissonance notwithstanding.
I will try and decide whether it is informed or not once I have decyphered your text.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo