Pentax/Ricoh putting prices up
I good and long term friend of mine in the the photo trade, more than 1 outlet. I know that when he sells a DSLR, in most cases the business makes 5% or less. More than this in considered very good....5%!!!! A certain top brand to be competitive the margin at point of sale can be 0....yes 0%...
Has anybody ever though that Pentax have been absorbing increases and maybe now are forced to increase prices.. Also, maybe dealers are beginning to realise that if they want to pay the bills, staff and keep a roof over their heads maybe they need to make something!!
People moan about fuel..yes it bis expensive but compare it to beer. When you think what the raw materials are of beer, and how it is made, compare that with all the costs and expertise of oil drilling and refining....suddenly ur Friday night Ale looks very very expensive...
Only a few weeks ago some people on here i saw moaning that the K5 was too cheap!!!
These companies are having a hard time, the global giant Sony, $5 Billion losses......also, maybe Pentax lens prices are a little higher because they are better.....quite simply engineered better using better materials....judging by many pictures I see from Pentax users, that what I believe.
Other marques make cheap plastic cameras and lenses and they are welcome to do so. Frankly I wouldn't want to buy one. I also wouldn't want Pentax to be pressured into reducing standards.
I agree, Pentax products are generally better made than the norm. I expect that to cost money and it disturbs me that so many are only seemingly aware of price.
Other marques make cheap plastic cameras and lenses and they are welcome to do so. Frankly I wouldn't want to buy one. I also wouldn't want Pentax to be pressured into reducing standards.
I agree, Pentax products are generally better made than the norm. I expect that to cost money and it disturbs me that so many are only seemingly aware of price.
Other marques make cheap plastic cameras and lenses and they are welcome to do so. Frankly I wouldn't want to buy one. I also wouldn't want Pentax to be pressured into reducing standards.
Clearly Pentax nor probably any other marque will ever be at the right price/quality point for everyone.
My disappointment is a personal one. Was hoping to add the 21mm to my collection in the near future. I was suggesting to the missus that it was £300 and odd quid (even though the odd was another £79 if I recall correctly). Now at £500 and odd quid, I've got no chance for the forseeable
link
£399 at Mathers
link
-
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
I don't dispute that companies have to make money. I don't dispute that prices have to go up. Nor do I dispute that Pentax build quality is good.
But prices that go up 30% or more in one go is not the normal sort of inflation we deal with all the time.
I'm amazed that even the most Pollyanna-esque of Pentax fans can just react along the lines of "ah that's Ok then".
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
This would seem to be a world wide issue, and a simple explanation from Ricoh Pentax would be nice....
My disappointment is a personal one. Was hoping to add the 21mm to my collection in the near future. I was suggesting to the missus that it was £300 and odd quid (even though the odd was another £79 if I recall correctly). Now at £500 and odd quid, I've got no chance for the forseeable
link
£399 at Mathers
link
-
when he sells a DSLR, in most cases the business makes 5% or less. More than this in considered very good....5%!!!!
That's why a much better measure or profitability is something known as Return on Capital Employed or ROCE, where CE is the invested capital required to support the business.
If you friend has got the camera in stock on a sale or return basis his capital employed i 0 making his ROCE at a 5% sales margin infinite. Pretty good I'd say.
These companies are having a hard time, the global giant Sony, $5 Billion losses
But you're right. Those poor global companies. They need our help. Must save and plunge every penny into Pentax kit to keep them afloat.
I'm really staggered at the equanimity with which some people accept huge price hikes.
I don't dispute that companies have to make money. I don't dispute that prices have to go up. Nor do I dispute that Pentax build quality is good.
But prices that go up 30% or more in one go is not the normal sort of inflation we deal with all the time.
I'm amazed that even the most Pollyanna-esque of Pentax fans can just react along the lines of "ah that's Ok then".
Combine all these events & companies like Pentax have no option but to increase prices, look at how the hard drive industry has had to deal with the floods & the affect this has had on prices.
Price increases are always followed by price cuts, this happens time & time again, it was only a couple of years ago the DA* 50-135mm & the DA* 16-50mm had massive increases and are now nearly back to where they where before.
Concert photography
Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


4839 posts
19 years
South West London
However I am certain that it would be hard to swallow if your bottle of beer jumped from £2 to £4, the Carrera that was £400 went to £700 overnight and so people (including me admittedly) find hard to swallow the doubling of lens prices from last year.
No one is quibbling about camera prices, and no one would be quibbling if the lens prices were increasing by a few percent a year with inflation - or even above inflation.
It's sudden large increases that inevitably make people reassess things.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.