PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
Did you include a "save file" action as part of your sequence? Maybe you are closing the file before saving it?

K.

Comment by womble posted on Need a little help with CS2 at 06/03/2010 - 08:50

womble
I'll take your three and add more accurate exposure with older non-A glass. Although adjusting the exposure when shooting static subjects is easy, I have missed a few grab shots because of this.

K.

Comment by womble posted on How would you improve your Pentax SLR? at 06/03/2010 - 08:45

womble
You should be able to tweak the curve without blowing the highlights. It looks like a photographic lodestone to me. I would treat it as a long term project, going back at different times of year and different times of day and building up a portfolio of images.

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Boys' Village Part1: Abstracts and Patterns at 06/03/2010 - 08:40

womble
Excellent shot, and very sharp! K.

Comment by womble posted on On the Embankment at 05/03/2010 - 20:09

womble
Which camera did you use and did you have any problems mounting the lens?

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on New Moon with 1000mm Lens at 05/03/2010 - 20:05

womble
bwichmawr wrote:
Dr. Mhuni wrote:
Kris, did you have a digital body with you that day? Would be very interesting to see any shots you took with that if so, as a point of comparison.
What a brilliant idea! Can you recall during the early days of digital, AP and other publications carrying out direct film vs. digital comparisons? (Often to the detriment of digital at the time!) Nobody, to my knowledge has done this for a while. certainly not since cameras like the K10 were introduced.

Would make a most intersting weekend for somebody, particularly if an identical lens could be used...

Regards,

Andrew
Sorry folks, I must have left the digital at home that day. I'll be back there in the summer and can take some more then Perhaps I should take the Horseman...

K.

Comment by womble posted on Some for Andrew at 05/03/2010 - 17:41

womble
Something to make you smile, perhaps! K.

Comment Image

Comment by womble posted on A braver bird than I. at 05/03/2010 - 17:35

womble
If the coating gives a slight cast (e.g., slightly magenta, just for the sake of argument) and the AWB is programmed to remove that cast, when you use a lens that doesn't have that slight cast it will "correct" it giving a different value for the AWB. Or that is my take on it anyway!

I am just guessing wildly really but there is no doubt that certain K series lenses (esp the 135mm f/2.5) always give quite different AWB values compared to more modern lenses.

K.

Comment by womble posted on A's vs. DA's at 05/03/2010 - 17:05

womble
That is still £150 difference! If it is in good condition I'd buy the second hand Pentax lens myself and spend the extra £150 on something else.

K.

Comment by womble posted on 20mm lens at 05/03/2010 - 16:38

womble
My guess is that the AWB setting is also designed to take the modern coatings into account which is why the white balance between K series and DA series lenses can be very different.

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on A's vs. DA's at 05/03/2010 - 16:35

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo