PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
CWyatt wrote:
Hmm thanks for the comment on the foyer shot - may re-shoot.
Great if you can. It is a simple but very effective image especially with the shadow of the plant on the window.

K.

Comment by womble posted on The last few weeks in New Zealand at 22/09/2010 - 23:58

womble
The main thing I like about Lightroom is that it doesn't feel as though you are converting a RAW file to anything. It is just like editing any image (tweak levels, curves, dust spots, sharpening, noise reduction, cropping etc.) and then instead of doing a "save as" (I always keep my original unedited file) you do an export. Best of all, instead of having the original file, the edited full size file, the down-sized for the web file etc. you just have the original RAW file, a tiny sidebar XML file, and whatever exports you need. SOLD to the scruffy man with a beard...

Comment by womble posted on Silkypix vs. Lightroom Raw conversion at 22/09/2010 - 23:56

womble
johnriley wrote:
Quote:
Oh, and never delete anything.
Excellent advice.
And there is me trying to force myself to delete more due to the silly amounts of disk space my images now occupy. And I only "went digital" in 2007...

More on topic, Lightroom 3 is excellent. K.

Comment by womble posted on Problem with Lightroom 3 at 22/09/2010 - 23:49

womble
Reminded me I hadn't submitted any since July so I have just put some more in myself!

K.

Comment by womble posted on PPG Submission and Voting at 22/09/2010 - 23:39

womble
fatspider wrote:
Given the amount of negs you have I would think investing in the most expensive scanner you can afford would be logical, as said my experience of scanned by lab negs leaves a lot to be desired, the effort you could possibly have to expend to get these "useable" may be better employed in the time it takes to scan them yourself.
All of my Kodak BW400CN images posted here, on Flickr and accepted into the PPG were scanned by The Darkroom UK. These are their low res scans! The XP2 Plus films I got processed by CVS (a drugstore chain) in the US were dirty, sometimes scratched, and badly scanned. You get what you pay for I guess. Shame really as XP2 is not cheap (unlike the Kodak equivalent) and there were some shots I really liked that were ruined.

For existing negs/slides getting your own scanner is probably the only way to go unless you win the pools.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Film - developing and transfer to CD. Recommendations? at 22/09/2010 - 23:37

womble
I use an old Minolta Scan Dual III bought from a forum member. There is a newer model but it is no longer made. The main limitation is that it only does 35mm, not 120 or 5x4.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Film - developing and transfer to CD. Recommendations? at 22/09/2010 - 23:33

womble
The Darkroom UK do a good job and you can download a mailing label from their website. Their scans are generally OK. I normally pay for the lo res ones and if anything is worth doing to hi res I do it myself. Scanning to hi res oneself is so slow that it is worth doing it that way round.

I have also used Peak Imaging and they did a good job too.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Film - developing and transfer to CD. Recommendations? at 22/09/2010 - 22:57

womble
Stefan, I like the little smile one. Lovely use of natural light and a wide open lens. Very nicely done. K.

Comment by womble posted on PPG Submission and Voting at 22/09/2010 - 21:59

womble
Anvh wrote:
womble wrote:
The main use for ISO80 as far as I can see is to allow longer shutter speeds in order to blur moving water etc., a sort of alternative to using ND filters. The only time I drop to ISO 100 on my K20 is when it is so bright that I'd have to use very small apertures and I'd rather be using something nearer to the optimum aperture for the lens.

K.
There is another use for it, it's when the flash can't dial low enough for the aperture you want to use.
Good point. Not one I had thought of as usually my problem is the other way around, i.e., the flash hasn't got the legs.

Comment by womble posted on K5, was it worth the wait? at 22/09/2010 - 21:48

womble
I think Gwyn has hit the nail on the head. If it feels right then it is the camera for you. Picking up my old ME Supers today reminded me how much I like them, and the fact that I used nothing but an ME Super for about ten years means that I can use them without thinking. I don't even chimp at the back of them when I take a photograph!

Comment by womble posted on Pentax K-5 Autofocus System at 22/09/2010 - 21:46

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo