PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
It doesn't help with Pentax gear but for other makes the serial number can be informative. For most Soviet stuff the first two numbers of the serial number normally indicate the year, and for some Japanese third party lenses the number can indicate the actual manufacturer.

I dare say there are scams around that involve the numbers, but I cannot think what and, to be frank, wouldn't be bothered about giving out the number myself.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Serial Numbers and eBay at 16/09/2011 - 22:06

womble
Yet another update

Having just passed 50,000 views I thought another update was in order. Nothing serious about this, just curiosity and a bit of fun

The most viewed photograph was taken with my K20D and my SMC-M 100mm f/2.8 lens. It was featured in Flickr "explore" which gets you a lot of exposure/views (743 in my case).

Of the top 20 images:

6 are images of cameras/lenses.
2 were taken with my digital camera, both with manual focus lenses (the above mentioned 100mm lens and an Auto Takumar 55mm lens.)
2 were taken using 35mm film (both using my MX and Kodak Ektar 100)
The remaining 10 images were all taken using my free Lubitel 2 TLR on a variety of colour and BW films.

All hail the Lubitel! Before people start moaning about "Lomography", my old Lubitel is surprisingly sharp and free from vignetting. In fact, you'd be hard pushed to tell the difference between it and my Yashicamat 124G.

Cheers, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Funny old flickr at 16/09/2011 - 19:02

womble
All taken in Romania on the road to Dobrogea across the Danube plain, Pentax K20D, kit lens, processed in Lightroom 1.4.

1. Not much there (colour version)
Comment Image


2. Not much there (monochrome version)
Comment Image


3. He was only 31 (1)
Comment Image


4. He was only 31 (2)
Comment Image


Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Not much there. at 16/09/2011 - 18:47

womble
Gwyn wrote:
Illogical to go from the K-7 to the K-5 to the K-9. Still Pentax never were known for the logic of their camera names!
That's true. The *ist etc. series of names was a marketing faux pas. How do you say it? "Star-ist"?, "Star eye ess tee?" And more importantly, how do you search for it online?!

K.

Comment by womble posted on Pentax Q and other bits of info. at 16/09/2011 - 14:02

womble
thoughton wrote:
... IQ is crapper (is that a word?)
Only in the sense of Thomas Crapper, not the inventor of the flush toilet (despite what is often claimed) but founder of Thomas Crapper and Co. I have a Crapper manhole cover rescued from the building site.

K.

Comment by womble posted on What if the Q had been made by a different company? at 16/09/2011 - 13:58

womble
Some very positive sounding comments there although I think calling a camera the K-9 would be a mistake!

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on Pentax Q and other bits of info. at 16/09/2011 - 13:47

womble
DrOrloff wrote:
I had something very similar sounding with my K20D...(along with every other fault going). The diagnosis was that an internal screw (I think from the tripod socket assembly on the base) had worked itself loose and lodged itself under the magnetic sensor plate, preventing the sensor from moving properly.
Well off to the repairers it goes on Wednesday... Just hope they take less than the four months they took to repair my DA* 50-135mm

Thanks all. K.

Comment by womble posted on K20D fuzzy image problem. at 11/09/2011 - 20:51

womble
Anvh wrote:
I thought you had to put off SR when you are using a tripod.
Yes but:

Quote:
Whether SR was on or not, the camera made a horrible clonking noise as the timer counted down
Actually, the 2 sec timer turns SR off automatically.

K.

Comment by womble posted on K20D fuzzy image problem. at 11/09/2011 - 20:49

womble
I fear I know the answer to this one.

I am in Romania for work. The other day I went to take a picture of a large Roman tower and the images were very very fuzzy despite bright light etc.

Back at base I decided to test the camera further and so I set it up on a tripod and used the 2 second mirror-up delay etc. Whether SR was on or not, the camera made a horrible clonking noise as the timer counted down, and I was getting images with the main image looking OK-ish but a second ghost image slightly offset from it.

I think the SR has developed a nasty fault and at a very inconvenient time. Any suggestions folks, apart from send it for repair?

I have a batch of macro shots to do today and I am going to have to revert to using the LX and BW film. Shame I left the FB-1/FD-1 viewfinder at home but at least I have my hand held meter. (Yes, I know the LX has excellent metering but the artefacts are set on black background which I want to be black, not gray!)

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment by womble posted on K20D fuzzy image problem. at 11/09/2011 - 07:02

womble
There is a setting in the menus for the K10/K20 as to what you want reset and what you want to keep each time you turn it on. I have it set to put the ISO to 200 and get rid of any exposure compensation etc. No idea if the K-m has the same sort of thing?

K.

Comment by womble posted on KM Resetting time at 11/09/2011 - 06:55

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo