PLUS

womble

Joined: 11th September 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

womble
I wonder how it would perform with the A*1200mm...

Comment by womble posted on Who says Pentax don't make long lenses at 20/09/2011 - 13:41

womble
Synchronized wikipedia citations... Is that a new Olympic sport?

Comment by womble posted on Lens adapters for Q at 20/09/2011 - 13:20

womble
Mainly used for 16mm cine films.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Lens adapters for Q at 20/09/2011 - 13:19

womble
For many years my 28mm lens was probably my most used one on film. I'd like something similar for digital, i.e., around about 17/18mm. The K18 would be nice but they go for serious money... Unfortunately, the equivalent FoV is somewhere between the 15mm and 21mm lenses. The 12-24mm is such a stunning lens though I don't feel hard done by.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Fixed or zoom? at 20/09/2011 - 13:17

womble
Modern top-end zooms are such good quality these days that for most purposes (if not all!) you'd be perfectly happy with the results. The issue becomes more about size and speed. Fast top-end zooms are often big and heavy! As much as I love my DA* 50-135mm lens, it gets left at home more often than it should because I have packed a batch of older primes instead. This is partly because I prefer lenses that can be used on both my digital camera (when it is working ) and my film bodies.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Fixed or zoom? at 20/09/2011 - 11:20

womble
ChrisA wrote:
womble wrote:
My guess is that the focus ring won't go into the macro range at all focal lengths.
That was my guess, too, but it's wrong

There's no change in focus throw between the extremes of the zoom range.

The closest focusing distance marked on the barrel is 2.1m, with a green line leading to the 'flower' macro icon beyond that. It actually focuses down to about 18 inches or so at both ends of the zoom range.
According to what passes for a manual the closest focus varies with focal length so perhaps it was just a way of saying "closer than 2.1m". It appears to have a very short focus throw so I am guessing manual focus will be a PITA.

K.

Comment by womble posted on SMC FA 28mm F3.8 - 200mm F5.6 AL (IF) at 20/09/2011 - 11:13

womble
It is highly unlikely to be true macro. It is quite common for consumer zooms to be advertised as such when 'close-focusing' would be accurate. Who is going to let mere factual accuracy get in the way of a good marketing ploy?

K.

Comment by womble posted on SMC FA 28mm F3.8 - 200mm F5.6 AL (IF) at 20/09/2011 - 11:11

womble
petrochemist wrote:
johnriley wrote:
That was quick off the mark, someone has seen an opportunity!
Perhaps they should change the mount code from P/Q to PDQ!


The ability to use C-mount and other lenses was always going to be one of the attractions of the Q for a certain segment of the market.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Lens adapters for Q at 20/09/2011 - 10:59

womble
AndrewA wrote:
Thanks for this info - I was after the manual as I was intrigued by the macro marker on the focus ring.
You guys got any thoughts on it?
Just guessing here but some macro zoom lenses will only go to the 'macro' range at either one setting or a limited range of settings. The SMC-F 35-70 for example only clicks into macro at 70mm and the Tamron 70-300 between ??180 and 300 (I cannot remember the exact lengths). My guess is that the focus ring won't go into the macro range at all focal lengths.

K.

Comment by womble posted on SMC FA 28mm F3.8 - 200mm F5.6 AL (IF) at 20/09/2011 - 10:56

womble
Looks fun! Some of yowa yowa's are really quite convincing and nicely composed too.

K.

Comment by womble posted on Levitation Photography at 20/09/2011 - 10:34

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo