All Forum Comments
Comment by Tyr posted on should pentax dslrs have face detection added at 12/12/2008 - 14:18
Wow, my text has gone!
Comment by Tyr posted on Forum quirk: at 11/12/2008 - 19:54
Sorry, couldn't resist.
If you posted some 100% crops we may be able to gauge what you are getting at better.
Comment by Tyr posted on K100d not sharp! at 11/12/2008 - 19:52
Me:
K10D + Grip
DA*50-135f2.8
DA*16-50f2.8 (shared)
Metz 58-AF1 + Bubble Wrap Diffuser https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/Best-Diffuser-Solutions-7030
Photograhper 2:
K10D
Tamron 90mm Macro
DA*16-50 (shared)
Metz 58-AF1 + Bubble Wrap Diffuser
I could not have lived with just one lens. Having someone helping was useful (and quite productive) but is not essential.
Unfortunately I have not uploaded any of my photos from the wedding yet. I've not uploaded a single photo for months!
The kit covered everything very well.
41 shots for the album (18 from 16-50, 20 from 50-135 and 3 from 90), plus 50-100 photos for the companion CD (which is the only part I have not finished).
Of the total number of shots I have kept, 174, 64 are from the 16-50, 107 from the 50-135 and 3 from the 90.
Comment by Tyr posted on Lens & Flash for wedding (for K10D) at 04/12/2008 - 22:08
No.
Every penny spent on stupid gimmicks for stupid people is one less penny for useful features, or better quality construction.
G
(Infuriated purist)
The shallower DoF on an SLR compared to a P&S would also make the process a lor more arduous than actually taking a couple of shots.
I just shot a wedding and nobody was out of focus even with multiple rows. I don't think I had any shots over f5.6. Choose your focus point well and have the right arrangement and things will work (amazing that things work if you have a clue what you are doing).
Comment by Tyr posted on should pentax dslrs have face detection added at 04/12/2008 - 21:49
Comment by Tyr posted on What do you think of the following at 01/12/2008 - 19:40
Comment by Tyr posted on Pentax K200D Discontinued. at 01/12/2008 - 19:38
Then when I next meet them I should be able to present the finished product.
Good to see an other person using Loxley as it gives me more confidence in their work and products.
I wouldn't print my own as I can't afford a fuji colour laserlab contraption and then getting the pictures mounted perfectly is nerve wrecking. If someone else assembles my design with a guarantee of precicion and experience then that is good.
Comment by Tyr posted on Album Printing at 26/11/2008 - 12:43
I am assembling a few screen mock-ups for them to choose but this is a little difficult as I am missing all the photos from the 2nd photographer (my partner) as she hasn't had a chance to even look at them yet.
One wedding under my belt and part way to a portfolio
It is a long time to the next one though, August...
Comment by Tyr posted on Album Printing at 24/11/2008 - 12:37


Face detection (FD) on an SLR is kind of pointless, you lose a lot of freedom to shoot with such a feature. You can't control the aperture as this has to come under the control of FD for depth of field (DoF) to incorporate all the faces. FD would have to predict DoF at different apertures and how far each face is. This is not a problem on a P&S as the DoF is HUGE! You will have to use liveview and scan the whole frame and majority of pixels with the FD algorithms which uses a lot of power on a large sensor. This leaves you with control over shutter speed and sensitivity only which is almost pointless as you want a high shutter speed to prevent movement appearing on the faces (FD will 'want' them sharp too).
All you end up with is a very bulky and expensive P&S with a lot of redundant features. It brings no benefit to either those who know what they are doing nor those who do not. It will not help someone who does not know or understand their equipment.
It is a pretty useless feature in a DSLR and should only be in P&S cameras.