All Forum Comments
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on First pics using my monopod at 14/01/2012 - 22:40
I had the Sigma 70-300 and soon afterwards got my hands on a Pentax 55-300 the difference in image quality is huge. As for the macro it is also not that great, the Tamron is no better either. Save the extra cash and make sure you choose the Pentax as it really is that much better.
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Tameron/Pentax at 08/01/2012 - 11:30
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on BBC - Your Pictures of the Year at 08/01/2012 - 11:04
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on K10D & macro at 07/01/2012 - 10:22
"The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine." - Sir Isaac Newton
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Hi at 07/01/2012 - 10:14
And the most important thing is Shoot, Shoot, Shoot, Shoot, Shoot, Shoot even if the weather outside is bad shoot stuff indoors, practice with depth of field with that manual 50mm on kitchen items, bottles of wine, kids toys anything really just shoot.
And above all enjoy.
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Hi at 07/01/2012 - 10:00
Also check out the special offers
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Tripod for Nature Photography at 07/01/2012 - 00:29
Then I read about a Pentax K20D that stated it was water resistant and as I was taking more and more pictures at my local kart track, Llandow, I decided this was probably a good camera to have and besides I'd heard of Pentax and seem to remember when I was a kid it was the canines under carriage of cameras. So I began to read up about it ont tinterweb but the general consensus was that it was not ideal for sports shots because of the low burst rate and its slow AF. So I was back to the D90.
Then I thought, if I was prepared to entertain the price of the K20 then I may as well go for the D300, as the S had recently been released and I didn't give 2 hoots about video (and still don't) the D300 was going to be just in my price range. Then while looking on all these lovely new (to me) photography websites the announcement that Pentax were releasing a new flagship to replace the K20, the K-7, which had 5.2 frames/sec, WR was smaller almost exactly the same size as my previous Fuji S100fs. It had loads of additional functions was tougher than a Tonka toy. I read review after review for months while saving for it and was hooked, I joined this site before getting it and stayed hidden for a while before coming out to be counted.
Strangely I have recently had the opportunity to use a friends Canon 500D and boy am I glad I made the decision I did. My K-7 is vastly superior to it except for one little thing, in low light the 500D flashes its onboard flash to assist with focus and it works (are you watching Pentax?)
My K-7 is built like a tank and I have averaged 83 shots per day since I came into possession on 6th Jan 2010, it has never let me down and everything on it still works just fine. It is currently in for a service having done over 61,000 actuations and probably needs a little TLC. Pentax said it is good for 100,000 so I intend to test that theory.
Really glad I made the choice I did and the fun you can have with all those excellent old lenses is endless and much better for learning how to use your camera than attaching the latest VR or OS AF lenses. I urge all new Pentax owners to get hold of a fully manual lens and learn to use it, this will teach you more about your camera in a much quicker timescale, and its great fun.
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on Why did you choose Pentax? at 07/01/2012 - 00:27
Comment by SteveEveritt posted on FS: Panagor Auto Macro 1:1 Converter at 03/01/2012 - 18:20

2. time - 11:54

3. then 5 mins later - 11:59 (note the conditions in the dock)

4. 'ammerin' down

Comment by SteveEveritt posted on The weather today at 02/01/2012 - 13:29

