All Forum Comments
I would have thought AA's would be an advantage?
Comment by smc posted on K-x TIPA awards at 25/04/2010 - 22:44
Great price - second in line if it's still for sale!
Comment by smc posted on SMC Pentax-A 24mm / f2.8 at 23/04/2010 - 21:08
Thanks for everyone's interest. Now sold.
Comment by smc posted on FS: VIVITAR 55mm F2.8 LIFE SIZE MACRO PK MOUNT at 03/04/2010 - 23:48
I have a Tamron 90/2.5 macro and Pentax 100mm macro, so this is surplus to requirements now. The Vivitar 55mm f2.8 auto macro is highly regarded for good resolution and image quality. There are lots of references on google.
The lens is in good condition with clean glass and clean, snappy aperture. Focusing is smooth and well damped with a long throw for accurate close focusing. The front element is deeply recessed and well protected. There is some paint wear to the barrel but nothing too noticeable. The lens mount and filter thread are in good condition.
The major plus is that it will go to 1:1 macro without extension tubes.
Needless to say, the lens works on all PK mount SLRs except some of the AF models. On digital, the lens has an approximate field of 80mm and makes a very nice portrait lens and general purpose lens also.
Also included are a rear lens cap and UV filter.
Asking price is £60 plus postage: probably £5 in the UK and £10 to Europe. Paypal gift is preferable.
I can send more photos of the lens or taken with it if anyone is interested.
[IMG]http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac26/zuikologist/P1070420.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac26/zuikologist/P1070422.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac26/zuikologist/P1070421.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac26/zuikologist/P1070418.jpg[/IMG]
The lens is in good condition with clean glass and clean, snappy aperture. Focusing is smooth and well damped with a long throw for accurate close focusing. The front element is deeply recessed and well protected. There is some paint wear to the barrel but nothing too noticeable. The lens mount and filter thread are in good condition.
The major plus is that it will go to 1:1 macro without extension tubes.
Needless to say, the lens works on all PK mount SLRs except some of the AF models. On digital, the lens has an approximate field of 80mm and makes a very nice portrait lens and general purpose lens also.
Also included are a rear lens cap and UV filter.
Asking price is £60 plus postage: probably £5 in the UK and £10 to Europe. Paypal gift is preferable.
I can send more photos of the lens or taken with it if anyone is interested.
[IMG]http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac26/zuikologist/P1070420.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac26/zuikologist/P1070422.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac26/zuikologist/P1070421.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i882.photobucket.com/albums/ac26/zuikologist/P1070418.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by smc posted on FS: VIVITAR 55mm F2.8 LIFE SIZE MACRO PK MOUNT at 03/04/2010 - 10:23
No, unless it is an M42 mount or T/T2 mount, in which case you could the Pentax K mount adaptor. Depending on the lens, you might be able to hack a new mount (most likely for Contax I think).
Comment by smc posted on adapter for tokina 500 at 31/03/2010 - 23:19
These ar quite difficult to find these days. Would an Epson flatbed or Plustek scanner work for you?
Comment by smc posted on Wanted: Minolta Scan Dual III or IV at 31/03/2010 - 14:11
bjolester wrote:
Thank you very much Kris for your valueable information about the MX!
This afternoon I bought two Varta V357 batteries, and like you said above they also have the code LR44 printed on them. So these must be the appropriate ones for the MX.
I changed the light seals on my Spotmatic two weeks ago, using the Jon Goodman/Interslice kit. The Spotmatic was given to me for free and has been used a lot during its lifespan, so I did not have too many doubts about going ahead with this operation on my own. My first film with the Spotmatic was processed yesterday, and it seems that the light seals fix was a success (The only problem with the pictures is that they have a slight tint of sepia/yellow due to my thorium infected Super-Takumar lens). With my mint MX, on the other hand, I am not sure if I dare to do any repairs myself. It is such a beautiful little camera!
Would it be possible to check the light meter on the MX by comparing light readings with my K20D?
I have been considering using Harrow Technical. We have an excellent Pentax workshop here in Norway, but the price level for camera repair/maintenance is very very high in Norway.
Regards
Bjørn
Comparison to the K20D should be fine. Set the K20D to centre weighted metering.Thank you very much Kris for your valueable information about the MX!
This afternoon I bought two Varta V357 batteries, and like you said above they also have the code LR44 printed on them. So these must be the appropriate ones for the MX.
I changed the light seals on my Spotmatic two weeks ago, using the Jon Goodman/Interslice kit. The Spotmatic was given to me for free and has been used a lot during its lifespan, so I did not have too many doubts about going ahead with this operation on my own. My first film with the Spotmatic was processed yesterday, and it seems that the light seals fix was a success (The only problem with the pictures is that they have a slight tint of sepia/yellow due to my thorium infected Super-Takumar lens). With my mint MX, on the other hand, I am not sure if I dare to do any repairs myself. It is such a beautiful little camera!
Would it be possible to check the light meter on the MX by comparing light readings with my K20D?
I have been considering using Harrow Technical. We have an excellent Pentax workshop here in Norway, but the price level for camera repair/maintenance is very very high in Norway.
Regards
Bjørn
Comment by smc posted on Pentax MX service at 30/03/2010 - 17:57
It is a good lens from all accounts, and probably well suited to film but perhaps not digital. A cheaper alternative might be the Vivitar 19-35, which is also good when stopped down a little.
Comment by smc posted on Tamron 17.35 F2.8/4 at 29/03/2010 - 15:06
womble wrote:
Not that far off the old standard of 70/80 to 200/210 surely?
BTW. The 50-135mm is gorgeous but I didn't post before as I have no experience of the other two.
K.
You are right. I think I am probably more used to 70-300 offerings these days.Not that far off the old standard of 70/80 to 200/210 surely?
BTW. The 50-135mm is gorgeous but I didn't post before as I have no experience of the other two.
K.
Comment by smc posted on Addicted to fast glass ... at 29/03/2010 - 13:17
50-150 is a strange focal length for digital (75-225).
Comment by smc posted on Addicted to fast glass ... at 29/03/2010 - 13:09
