All Forum Comments
Comment by simonkit posted on Pentax and Samsung at 02/03/2011 - 10:02
I'm really wondering if the FA 28-70 will produce results close to the DA17-70 which I'm considering selling as I don't need the range - the FA 28mm & F 28mm are also lenses I'm considering but are obviously much more expensive than the 28-70...to give you an idea why my lens lineup now is:
DA12-24, DA 35mm F2.4, DA 55-300 & 0bviously the DA17-70 - I also now have a tamron 18-250 for "travel" use
Comment by simonkit posted on Any FA 28-70 F4 owners? at 01/03/2011 - 19:03
thanks
Simon
Comment by simonkit posted on Any FA 28-70 F4 owners? at 01/03/2011 - 17:38
Simon
Comment by simonkit posted on Wanted: Fastpack 250, 350 or similar at 28/02/2011 - 19:05
I shall click on with my faithful K20D
I've decided to do the same, on the whole I'm very happy with the results from my K20D and the more I read about sensor stain & BF/FF issues with the K5 the more I think I'm happy to wait a little longer until they've definitely been sorted...I never buy a new model car for the same reaason as it seems these days new product testing is done by the first customers!!
Simon
Comment by simonkit posted on The Future of K5 Prices at 26/02/2011 - 11:10
Simon,
The cheapest way to gain a few stops would be the DA35 f2.4.
I haven't got one myself but photos taken with do look good. Plus I do think using a fixed focal length rather than a zoom, in a subtle way, alters the way you approach your shots and gives you an alternative.
A K5+35mmf2.4 bundle would be a great kit!
MZ
Simon
Comment by simonkit posted on Why is the Tamron 17-50 F2.8 not more popular? at 26/02/2011 - 10:13
if you do buy one get one online so you can return under dsr & order another...
I was just intrigued really as I recently came across some excellent shots taken with the lens, some nice ones on your site too. Although the constant F2.8 is appealing against the DA17-70 F4 my next purchase will be a K5 so I'll gain a few stops over my K20D anyway
thanks
Simon
Comment by simonkit posted on Why is the Tamron 17-50 F2.8 not more popular? at 25/02/2011 - 14:13
If I'm hiking in good light I don't use a tripod most of the time, I use a Slik Pro Pod 381CF (superceeded now I think) and it works great as it just gives that bit more support for critical sharpness.
Back to tripods though for normal use I use one of the Redsnapper ones and its excellent - every bit as good as the Manfrotto I used to have and a lot cheaper , I have the Aly version but the CF is apparently just as good.
For hiking though I have a Velbon Ultra Luxi F which unfortunately they don't make anymore but it's an excellent compromise when it comes to stability vs weight, its very compact too - well worth looking at the Velbon range, not a top name but some models (not all) are pretty good
Like Matt I also carry around a Slik Mini Pro V, together with a beanbag - you can normally find somewhere to put them
Simon
Comment by simonkit posted on Ultimate backpacker tripod reccomendations? at 25/02/2011 - 13:45
Having said the above my impression is also that it doesn't quite produce the excellent colour/contrast of the DA17-70 and as a result I've had a rethink - a slightly costly one. I'm going to keep both the 17-70 & 18-250 for the following setup
DA12-24 & DA17-70 - landscape usage
DA12-24 & 18-250 - travel usage
Occasionally I do the odd uk wildlife trip and the DA55-300 is definitely the better option here so I'll be keeping it - the DA 35mm F2.4 should be great as either a pano lens or a low-light option when travelling. That's certainly it for my lens line-up now, just waiting for the K5 to fall in price a bit more and that should keep me going for a good while
Simon
Comment by simonkit posted on considering selling the Da 17-70 at 24/02/2011 - 22:22


Simon