All Forum Comments
Comment by RR posted on K7 HDR hypothetical question at 04/07/2009 - 23:50
Shame it's sealed or I could have included a fake bill of sale for £500 in case your missus opened it by mistake
Comment by RR posted on View across the Mersey Estuary as the sun sets begind Liverpool at 04/07/2009 - 23:29
Shame about the surroundings as it's a funky looking caravan indeed.
Comment by RR posted on Fake cow and caravan at 04/07/2009 - 23:03
Comment by RR posted on Wasp nest; based on an idea by Telstar. at 04/07/2009 - 23:02
Apologies that I cannot tidy up the original post but editing is not allowed it seems.
Still available:
Pentax K20d (roughly 4500 shutter activations)
Pentax Da 18-55mm II f3.5-5.6
Pentax Da 14mm f2.8
Pentax FA 50mm f1.4
Sigma 30mm f1.4
Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 EX DG HSM II Macro
BARGAIN BIN: with prices to avoid evilbay
Pentax-m 50mm f1.7 with caps, couple of specs of dust inside but does not affect IQ
£15 including delivery
Super Paragon extension tubes - no contacts but does have aperture lever
£15 including delivery
LL-60 focus screen (includes case & tweezers)
£20 including delivery
Cheapo chinese split prism focus screen
Cheapo chinese 2 stage remote release with bulb lock-off
£6 each including delivery
Comment by RR posted on All my Pentax gear For Sale at 04/07/2009 - 22:58

Comment by RR posted on Wasp nest; based on an idea by Telstar. at 04/07/2009 - 22:49
Comment by RR posted on Water water everywhere... at 04/07/2009 - 21:06
DG 530 Super
10-17mm
2x Pz-AF TC
All sold pending payment.
Reverse adapter & 52-49mm step down ring sold & paid.
In broken-english negotiation over 70-200
Everything else still available & will be listed on ebay tomorrow evening if unsold.
Comment by RR posted on All my Pentax gear For Sale at 04/07/2009 - 18:38
RR - interesting reasoning for switching brands. Surely some NR software would have been far cheaper than a whole system change. If you use RAW then you would be post processing anyway.
In any case, good luck with the switch and I hope it assists you in gettng what you need from photography.
A noisy image has less detail initially due to being obscured by the noise.
Applying noise reduction further reduces the detail .
In capturing a cleaner initial image you retain more detail & can push the post processing further without suffering too much degradation.
It's the chroma (or colour) noise that bothers me, the luminance I can live with (although less is better).
Comment by RR posted on Leaving Pentax at 04/07/2009 - 15:19
I have taken a shot for the fortnightly competition with the 10-17mm so it's not forgotten.
Comment by RR posted on Leaving Pentax at 04/07/2009 - 13:26


ie: you want a hdr image of 3 exposures you take one at -1 ev one normal & one +1 ev
lets say your -1 is a one second exposure, mid is 2 secs, & +1 is 4 secs. Is it not possible that instead of taking 3 exposures of 1,2 & 4 secs that you could take one 4 sec image & the camera could record 3 seperate exposures by "saving the data" at the 1 sec & 2 sec point without using the mechanical shutter. After all it is just recording a load of ones & zeros & should be able to work this out. Digital compacts have no mechanical shutter after all.
Now 4 secs is not going to help with movement but when you scale this to high shutter speeds you could freeze motion in HDR also. Surely it's just a matter of the right algorythm & enough computing power & speed to carry this off ?
Just an idea, do you think I need to patent it & get on Dragons Den ?