All Forum Comments
Comment by rparmar posted on What microphone for video? at 08/06/2011 - 22:28
I've recorded acoustic guitar, electric guitar and singing with them and it sounds great.
The application here is video, which I assume means capturing both dialogue and ambiance in the field. Recorders with high noise floor cannot be recommended for this application.
If I had to critique two points they would be that it doesn't feel strongly built (so don't treat it roughly... why would you anyway?)
As for some of the opinions listed here: I can't believe that you're comparing a cheap personal recorder to field recorders costing many many times the price... Compare apples with apples eh?!
For what it's worth, I have been recommending inexpensive gear with a distinctly better ability to get the job done than gear the same price or slightly less. The fact that Zoom recorders are often recommended in certain circles only points to a lack of knowledge about alternatives. That's all well and good but aren't we on a Pentax forum? Look to other options.
Comment by rparmar posted on What microphone for video? at 08/06/2011 - 21:22
Comment by rparmar posted on What microphone for video? at 08/06/2011 - 20:54
Avisoft Bioacoustics are authorities and have tested the LS-10/11/5 as having the same low noise pre-amps:
http://www.avisoft.com/recordertests.htm
The LS-7 is 4dB noisier, which is still amazing for its form factor. I don't see the point of going that small, however. It becomes self-defeating.
Getting this sort of recording excellence under 200 is insane. Imagine if a K-5 was that price? That's how these recorders make me feel.
Comment by rparmar posted on What microphone for video? at 08/06/2011 - 20:21
So instead they add video and paint it black!
Comment by rparmar posted on What microphone for video? at 08/06/2011 - 03:45
* It comes with custom software instead of Cubase. I use neither so it doesn't matter a bit.
* It has 2GB internal versus 8GB. Anyway, I prefer to add SD cards as needed.
* It's missing the remote and pouch. The pouch is too tight a fit once the windsocks are in place, so that is no loss either.
For all this you save 100 Euro.
Comment by rparmar posted on What microphone for video? at 08/06/2011 - 00:38
Comment by rparmar posted on 16-45 or 17-70? at 06/06/2011 - 17:11
Depth of field suffers proportionately with increased magnification. This results in two issues. First, focusing is a lot more critical. A tripod is a necessity and macro rails recommended.
Second, you have to stop down more to get enough of your subject in focus. Therefore, you need more light, and this needs to be targeted on your subject. That's why there are special ring lights, etc. available for macro.
All of this results in greater commitment to macrophotography. Macro of up to 1:2 may be sufficient for your purposes and avoid some of this expense.
Comment by rparmar posted on recommend a macro lens please at 06/06/2011 - 17:10
Comment by rparmar posted on Which wide & fast lens...? at 06/06/2011 - 16:24
Random recent image:
[IMG]http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5107/5768780381_67ee3115fa.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by rparmar posted on 12-24mm or 15mm at 06/06/2011 - 16:14


It is in fact very hard to tell what is a "good enough" product, since people are generally very unsure of the standards they require. Microphones are far more important than the recorder in any case.
As for cassette... I used them all the time with no problem. Sony Pro Walkman FTW!