All Forum Comments
I'm not sure there's a realistic gap for wildlife Rob, the 150-450mm fits the bill, plus of course the 560mm, which is quite compact for its length.
Could we really afford a 600mm f/4 or 400mm f/2.8? The existing lenses are pushing it, but just about affordable. It depends on our circumstances i know, but I'd find a £10,000 lens to be totally out of reach, even a £5000 one.
The likes of Sigma and Tamron see that market and I guess that almost all their sales go to the aformentioned systems and by not making their large lenses available with K mount that puts more pressure on Pentax to respond; Pentax has positioned itself for outdoor photography with its WR so that only makes sense if the lenses are there as well.
Comment by RobL posted on Practical Photography KS2 Review at 20/05/2015 - 22:27
Which raises a question - is the teleconverter compatible with full frame lenses on a full frame body?
The competition all have inbuilt flash
A majority of cameras from companies such as Canon and Nikon do NOT have built in flash, especially the newer releases that are due to come out from both of those companies - such as the 50mp+ models from Canon. For both of those named companies, mostly the entry level to a select few of the intermediate level models have built in fill flash.
Ironically though... Most of the Leica models do not have built in flash, but the top of the digital line Hasselblad's do have quite an impressive fill flash. I have yet to EVER see anyone use a fill flash on a Hasselblad in the real world though
Comment by RobL posted on K3 II AF... at 12/05/2015 - 12:30
Comment by RobL posted on K3II specs leaked online... at 10/05/2015 - 17:07
I think Ricoh see the lack of third party lenses as a positive in removing competition so gives confidence to developing the Pentax range. However for us consumers is that a monopoly means there is less incentive to reduce prices. The problem with the relatively small Pentax market is that it is difficult to justify the more exotic fast supertelephotos like those by Canon so I had the same qualms about whether to change brands for nature photography, but then reality kicked in when I realized that I was never going to pay the thousands of pounds they cost and it is probably a good idea to remove the temptation!
Comment by RobL posted on Bit of a Dilemma at 06/05/2015 - 18:13
Comment by RobL posted on practical photography at 03/05/2015 - 19:03
Comment by RobL posted on A Quick Guide to the Pentax AF360/540-FGZ II at 03/05/2015 - 18:50




Back on topic, I'd love a TS lens, please. The venerable 28mm 'K' shift lens is good, but showing its age, and 28mm is not that wide on APS-C. (In fact I was once seriously thinking of buying another make of camera and their TS lens, whilst sticking to Pentax for everything else I do)..