RichardDay

Joined: 19th May 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

RichardDay
From v3.0 for both PC & Mac versions.

http://www.silkypixuk.com/...om_contact_enhanced/Itemid,91/id,6/view,contact/

Offer ends 21 May 2010.

Comment by RichardDay posted on Special UK Easter upgrade to Silkypix Pro for just £50 at 29/03/2010 - 20:04

RichardDay
After some delay! - Mac users will be happy!
UK - http://www.silkypixuk.com/index.php/Silkypix-Software/

Plus there is a special Easter upgrade promotion to Pro from v.3 for just £50! For both PC & Mac versions.
http://www.silkypixuk.com/...om_contact_enhanced/Itemid,91/id,6/view,contact/

Comment by RichardDay posted on Silkypix Pro and V4 now available for Mac at 29/03/2010 - 20:02

RichardDay
I have a Billingham 307 and find it a very roomy, yet extremely comfortable, bag. It can hold my K20D + DA17-70, DA*60-250, DA 12-24, FA 50 and Samsung 100 macros (all with hoods reversed), Metz 54 flash, blower, cloths, straps, batteries, car charger, notebook+pens, some Cokin grads and P holder, cable release and some other bits.

If I'm looking to have a lighter walk around kit, I just leave out what I don't want, the bag size and weight is not a major issue.

Unfortunately the Billinghams do look expensive, especially when new, thereby advertising potentially precious contents!

As I rarely tramp around in the wet, I've never really tested how weatherproof it is.

I must admit that I also do use a cheap Lowepro CompuDaypack quite alot, as I find it very convenient and easy to just chuck stuff into. It has orange panels and looks like so many of the usual hiking backpacks so popular these days.

Comment by RichardDay posted on Bag recommendations/comments? at 29/03/2010 - 13:28

RichardDay
SRS have an "as new" Samsung 12-24 for £499, which is not that much more than the Sigma or Tamron.

I bought one in preference after trying several of the others to ensure a good copy. The 12-24 was better than the best of the others.

Comment by RichardDay posted on which 10-20 - if at all? at 25/03/2010 - 08:26

RichardDay
The NR section has improved dramatically, especially with regard to colour noise. ISO 3200 shots clean up very well.

Comment by RichardDay posted on Lightroom 3 Beta 2 available at 24/03/2010 - 09:18

RichardDay
Mike-P wrote:
Oh .. I actually thought you was joking Dave that's why I didn't mention I was moving back to Spain tomorrow.

Picture taken with a PENTAX camera

Comment Image
Hmm, similar combo that I've recently tried. I had the 7D + 15-85 and 100-400L.

It will be very interesting to hear what you think about the trio. I will keep my views under wraps until then!

Comment by RichardDay posted on The Sigma 150-500 at 23/03/2010 - 16:43

RichardDay
The 18-250 is a good super-zoom, but that's it. Enough said?

The 17-70 is indispensable, I even prefer it to the DA*16-50. Take it!

The 55-300 is very light and much better than anything else bar the DA* offerings. Take it!

If you have an ultra-wide (12-24?), take it, you may well need it, remember, this is a trip of a lifetime!

There you go, problem solved!

Have a fantastic trip.

Comment by RichardDay posted on Covenience vs quality - 18-250 or 17-70/55-300 at 22/03/2010 - 19:13

RichardDay
It's a great shot and Tim's quick editing has helped.

If you get the chance to go back to the same spot, may I suggest that you lower the camera a degree or two so that the horizon is level, then the "fishy" effect will hardly be noticable. Fish-eyes can be fantastic for shots like these, but like all wide perspective lenses, very careful framing is essential to get the best from them.

Comment by RichardDay posted on River Wye from Symonds Yat 10-17 fisheye at 21/03/2010 - 10:58

RichardDay
When are you getting the wood burner?

Comment by RichardDay posted on Another pointless thread at 20/03/2010 - 12:34

RichardDay
impotentspider wrote:
The thing is Gareth, with a 300mm and TC or similar I would have missed this shot, the bird would have landed and flown again before I'd located it in the viewfinder, with the Bigma I just zoomed out till I found it and intended to zoom in on it again, according to the exif this was shot at about 190mm. This is my first decent shot of this bird, they are so quick and difficult to capture, they dont even stay on feeders very long.

I think I need to be thinking of the 60-250DA and a decent TC.
That's a great capture, congratulations!

I have the DA*60-250 and the Promaster 1.7x TC that does work with the SDM but I find I rarely use the TC as most of my shots (not all! :wink are covered adequately by the 60-250 alone and the IQ IS that bit better, plus I'm not limited by the effective f6.3 maximum.

I frequently use my 60-250 at f4.0 or f4.5 as it's so good wide open. But it is nice to have the ability to extend the FL to 425mm, especially for those small bird shots like yours!

Comment by RichardDay posted on Willow Tit at 20/03/2010 - 10:05

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo