pschlute

Joined: 31st May 2006

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

pschlute
I like the first image. I keep comparing the crossing track/road with the crossing signs.

Comment by pschlute posted on Americana at 08/04/2010 - 09:36

pschlute
Barrie

ideally one should set it each time to the focal length you are using for the shot (in this case multiplied by 1.7 because of the t/c).

In practice that is a bit of a chore so I set it to the lower end of the range i expected to use. I anticipated using the 200-250 range for shots of the Pheasant so allowing for the t/c I entered 350 as my S/R focal length. If you are going to miss on the input length it is best to be on the low side as a longer input focal length will cause the camera to overcompensate and actually induce shake.

Comment by pschlute posted on 1.7x converter at 06/04/2010 - 10:03

pschlute
I took this shot hand held with the Pentax-F 1.7 converter and my DA* 60-250. The AF and exposure works just great. I need to tell the camera a focal length though for the shake reduction.

Comment Image

Comment by pschlute posted on 1.7x converter at 06/04/2010 - 09:33

pschlute
I like the third one...the white boat. The 16-50 is a great lens. I have always been a prime lens man, but since getting the 16-50 it is never off the camera, so useful.

The autofocus on mine can be a bit lazy, sometimes need to wake it up by turning the focus ring.

Comment by pschlute posted on Test on Pentax 16-50mm at 06/04/2010 - 09:25

pschlute
Nice. I like the tulip shot too.

Comment by pschlute posted on I made it in to the Pentax Photo Gallery! at 06/04/2010 - 09:14

pschlute
Sensible hat on: the M-50mm 1.4 will do the job at much less cost.

Sensible hat off: get the 1.2 and you will fall in love with it. It is a work of art.

Comment by pschlute posted on Someone tell me I don't need a SMC-K 50mm f1.2 at 10/03/2010 - 09:54

pschlute
whelmed wrote:
O-rly? Hrm, any chance you still have his contact?
Yes this is the chap [email protected]. You can do a search and see if he still sells on ebay.

I also must point out that the lens was priced in dollars, and in May 2008 when I bought it the exchange rate was about 1.9500 , making it cheaper in sterling.

Comment by pschlute posted on Someone tell me I don't need a SMC-K 50mm f1.2 at 09/03/2010 - 15:15

pschlute
whelmed wrote:
Hrm, really? I've only seen both the K and A going for obscene amounts on the bay. Where can one get one for cheaper then?
Maybe I am a bit behind the times then. i picked up a new A-50 1.2 for £325 about a year and a half ago. Also on ebay from a Japanese seller that had a batch of them.

Comment by pschlute posted on Someone tell me I don't need a SMC-K 50mm f1.2 at 09/03/2010 - 14:53

pschlute
You don't need it.....

..... but you buy it anyway.

Actually £300 is a bit steep for the "K" version.

Comment by pschlute posted on Someone tell me I don't need a SMC-K 50mm f1.2 at 09/03/2010 - 14:31

pschlute
most of the universal battery chargers have a car adapter. i got one for my K10, it was an irish company, cannot remember the name just now. It was basically a US style pin with adapters for most countries plus a car adapter. Works very well. I will try and find the name and post it here.

Comment by pschlute posted on K20D Batteries Car Charger? at 09/03/2010 - 09:27

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo