All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Choice at 06/07/2010 - 23:38
Landscapes - 16-45mm
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Choice at 06/07/2010 - 22:50
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Our trip to Seattle... at 06/07/2010 - 13:34
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on How much is enough (or too much?) (Digital Processing) at 06/07/2010 - 13:12
Sounds like it might be an idea to get the filters singly from a shop where you can play with them on your lenses, to be sure you get the most appropriate ones.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Grad filter sizes at 06/07/2010 - 10:30
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on All the gear and no idea? at 06/07/2010 - 09:00
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Which lightweight lens? at 05/07/2010 - 23:40
I don't think the 50-200mm reduces in quality toward the long end in the same way (but of course it doesn't even cover the long end of the 55-300mm's range so not a fair comparison). It's a MUCH more compact lens too.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Which to keep, what else to buy... at 05/07/2010 - 23:29
I though about putting a disclaimer in, but don't want to be pretentious about it, or get pestered as a result. Lets just say, I've been working alongside pro cameras for the past 12 years, and get very depressed when people try to do things with consumer toys
I think these cameras are a probably a pain in the ass for typical home movie video compared to normal consumer camcorders, but real budding film makers would be willing work around the limitations (maybe using external screens etc) to get the unique quality.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Shooting video on K-x at 05/07/2010 - 23:08
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Spot the PPG reject (8 images - sorry!) at 05/07/2010 - 20:07
Which do you prefer between the 50mm 1.7 and the Tamron 90mm I have thoght about buying the Tamron a few times.
Ian
Like you I also have my eye on the DA70mm, which looks a superb lens.