All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Pentax Photo Gallery at 27/10/2011 - 11:12
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Galapagos Pic's at 27/10/2011 - 01:31
It's a relevant comparison!
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Moving over to Pentax at 27/10/2011 - 01:06
The Other Place has some quite serious discussions about mounting Pentax's C-mount (security camera?) lenses on it because there are f1.0 zooms available.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Engadget Q review at 26/10/2011 - 18:26
However, if i were to print out a 16mp image at lets say a 100cm x70cm, my image resolution would end up resulting in 125ppi. After doing what is necessary in sharping and smoothing over as suggested, how bad would an image of this size really turn out?
To check image quality, have a go printing it on A4 - leave the 'fit to paper' box unchecked in the printer and you will get an A4 sized portion of the overall image. Then put the image on the wall and see what it looks like, imagining it is part of a much larger print. Remember for big prints you will take a few steps back so don't be too critical of what it looks like close up
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on image size at 26/10/2011 - 16:13
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Found this...thought of us! at 26/10/2011 - 11:51
But if you want to retain the 300ppi resolution, leave the 'resample image' box ticked and select 'bicubic smoother' from the drop-down menu. Sharpen the image slightly before printing if you wish.
'Resampling' means interpolation - PS intelligently adds new pixels based on the existing pixels either size. This can reduce sharpness, hence my advice on sharpening.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on image size at 26/10/2011 - 11:35
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Moving over to Pentax at 26/10/2011 - 09:59
He looks more like Zelda from Terrahawks every year
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Alice Cooper K-5 and the Tamron 17-50mm at 26/10/2011 - 09:38
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Engadget Q review at 26/10/2011 - 09:34

