Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
Pretty conclusive! Funny how it vignettes at 100mm or less, and 300mm, but not at 200mm.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on TEST: smc Pentax DA 55-300mm on FULL FRAME at 06/03/2012 - 01:04

Pentaxophile
43mm sold.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on FS: Sigma 30mm 1.4 / Pentax FA Ltd 43mm 1.9 at 04/03/2012 - 19:12

Pentaxophile
GeorgesM wrote:
I am almost sure that the one on the picture is a " dummy". Look at the IR sensor. Looks like painted.On the real one the sensor is recessed because of the bigger grip. In reality the silver K-5 doesn't look like painted. The feel/look is more like solid metal.
I've got the silver and the black but using mostly the black with a BG-4
because of the bigish zooms( F 2.. Without a GB-4 the bigger grip on the silver one makes a differance.

Greetings,
George
The pictured camera appears to be a computer generated render.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K5 reaches the end of the road... at 04/03/2012 - 17:47

Pentaxophile
Before doing anything, try formatting the memory card! The new WG2 does look excellent though.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Time for a new compact camera?? at 04/03/2012 - 01:33

Pentaxophile
Tamron have poisoned my mind! Sorry for responding to your rant with... another rant, by the way, Rob!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Shopping for WR lens rant at 04/03/2012 - 00:25

Pentaxophile
Why the rant, if you want a WR lens, just buy one! You have the 18-55WR, 16-50, 55*, 50-135*, 50-200WR, 60-250*, 90WR, 200* and 300* to choose from! Probably your local shops just don't stock them. So order them online.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Shopping for WR lens rant at 03/03/2012 - 21:34

Pentaxophile
Do we aspire to dull 'documentary' type still photos, or to pictures which have a bit more meaning and depth to them. It's not the remit of a Court photographer to put something of themselves into their pictures (quite the opposite). But I thought it was ours.

Maybe you're happy with mere record shots, taken from uninteresting angles, with obvious compositions, taken in dull light, and with no enhancement whatsoever. I'm not.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Lens vs Photoshop at 02/03/2012 - 20:30

Pentaxophile
Don wrote:
I knock ten years off a lady's age with just lighting....
Cheaper than beer, eh Don?

If your aspiration is simply a 'reasonably sharp image' at around f8 the kit lenses will do just fine, especially if you have good samples. And photoshop will squeeze a little more quality out of them. But Photoshop can't really provide the following things if they're not there in the first place:

- shallow depth of field
- fast apertures which help eliminate motion blur
- edge to edge sharpness
- special effects like fisheye lenses

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Lens vs Photoshop at 02/03/2012 - 17:13

Pentaxophile
jules wrote:
Nothing serious, saw this on my way home on one of my Bike rides the other day, and the Flash Gorden shaped Rocket cloud made me chuckle...
Cloud? That's what the Men In Black want you to think

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Goverments worst kept secret! at 02/03/2012 - 17:02

Pentaxophile
JamieT has posted some samples at either end of the range, but this site is helpful for visualising the effect of different focal lengths.

http://tamron-usa.com/lenses/learning_center/tools/focal-length-comparison.php

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Pentax SMC DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED Lens at 01/03/2012 - 17:58

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo