All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on PU Gallery View at 08/07/2013 - 12:21
I uploaded this shot to the PU gallery, and EPZ.
PU Gallery:

EPZ:

And the large version on the PU gallery:

(Probably oversharpened, that last one, but I was taking account of the smaller 'default' gallery view being softer).
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on PU Gallery View at 08/07/2013 - 11:47
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Optical overkill? at 08/07/2013 - 11:37
You just select the folder where the files are, select an output folder, choose your output file type and jpeg quality, and away it romps. Very useful.
Even more useful, you can get it to apply an 'Action' to each image. I recorded an Action to resize the image to 2000 pixels high, apply a Topaz Labs adjustment, and then sharpen. I then selected this action in the Image Processor, and voila, all the files were edited to that size, had the Topaz filter applied, and sharpened, automatically. Perfect for emailing a large number of shots quickly.
Then I thought why not create a watermark, and save that as an Action? So I opened an image, started recording a new Action, created my text layer and aligned it to the bottom and the right of the background layer, then flattened the image.
Now I can add the same watermark to a whole folder of images without needing to use additional software.
I'm sure this has probably been covered before on the forum, but i thought it was so useful, and I was so blissfully unaware, that I thought I would share.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Anyone using 'Image Processor' in Photoshop? at 08/07/2013 - 11:31
Terry, look no further!
http://www.techspot.com/downloads/3689-adobe-photoshop-cs2.html
Click this link to download it: LINK
Windows Serial number: 1045-1412-5685-1654-6343-1431
Mac OS X Serial number: 1045-0410-5403-3188-5429-0639
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Photo editing at 08/07/2013 - 10:55
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Photo editing at 08/07/2013 - 10:54
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Pentax K-30 body at 08/07/2013 - 10:08
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Optical overkill? at 08/07/2013 - 10:01

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Does it work? at 08/07/2013 - 09:52
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K50 Raw Buffer... at 08/07/2013 - 09:37


Both PU and EPZ have created smaller gallery views from this image (image 1 and 2). EPZ has retained the vibrancy whereas PU has produced an (admittedly slightly) duller image.
Try scrolling from image 1 (PU) to image 2 (EPZ) very quickly and you should see what I mean. Look at the dress and the sheen on the black paintwork.