All Forum Comments
Comment by paullucas posted on news leak specs on new Pentax k-9 at 25/05/2009 - 23:01
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Shake reduction on a tripod at 25/05/2009 - 22:57
Two of my brothers are in the police, Met and City. They love their jobs and I have a lot of respect for them.
Well done for capturing a great shot
After experiencin' this response, I even had a mad thought about documentin' the Police Force in the future.
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on A Policeman and his MP5 at 16/05/2009 - 00:42
My advice to you is to pick a good day and really test it.
I also like the short focusing distance that it has throughout the focal range. Although it's not a macro as such, the close shots are pretty good.
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Number of Birds from Today at 13/05/2009 - 14:21
That sounds really strange, will do some tripod tests over the next few days but i have to confess i wont be a happy bunny if its not sharp @ 400mm f8.
Everything was blowing about today so its probably really unfair to judge it.
How long have you had it?
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Number of Birds from Today at 13/05/2009 - 14:00
Scott you would not have got this service if you had bought anywhere else!
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on sigma 150-500mm dg hsm at 13/05/2009 - 13:42
I tend to agree with you about the HSM. I find that it does hunt for something to lock on to, especially when photographing a feathered friend.
The HSM is certainly quiet but I find that the non HSM are quicker but obviously louder.
I do like my new lens alot but often think whether I should have kept the 170-500mm as it was very reliable
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on sigma 150-500mm dg hsm at 13/05/2009 - 11:00
Yes, I did write that this effect is achieved in camera. The camera doesn't actually make separate exposures and then blend them.
For true HDR you would need separate exposures.
There is one effect that I use now and again and that is the soft focus, it's always handy to see what an image would like before mucking around in PS. It saves it as a copy so the original is safe.
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on What's the difference? at 13/05/2009 - 10:06
The only benefit that I can see to this is that you can then save the file unmolested in a photoshop file format, giving you the option to output the file with watermark turned on or off without having two copies floating around on you hard drive.
Because I've not had Elements 6 that long and the book that I bought I didn't find very helpful at all, too much jargon and not very user friendly.
So a short question on this friendly forum and it's all sorted...
I was given a book similar to the one you described as a gift. I got a bit out of it but gave up. I looked at the program and got the jist of the basics myself. Now and again I learn differnt things.
Anyway, I'm glad you got your query sorted, sorry for poking my nose in
Paul
Edited: Spelling mistake
Comment by paullucas posted on Adding text onto images via Elements 6 at 12/05/2009 - 21:27
Is it just the one image that you want to add txt to?
If it is then why don't you just select the tool from the side toolbar shaped like a "T" and just write on the image.
I use CS3 & 4 but have also previoulsly used Elements 5 & 6. They are all the same.
I'm just a tad confused
Paul
Comment by paullucas posted on Adding text onto images via Elements 6 at 12/05/2009 - 16:48


I hate to think where the eyepiece is.
Paul