All Forum Comments
hello ! I might have the opportunity to get - at a reasonable price ... - a 15 or a 21 limited, and would use it obviously for landscapes or architecture. which would you recommend ? not that it matters, but it would go onto a K20D or a K7. Thanks for advices ! Patrick
Comment by patrick posted on 15mm or 21mm limited ? at 13/01/2010 - 22:14
ok thanks for info - but who is SRS ? 10% off, ok - but VAT is going up in UK, and £ is not always favourable for Euros users ... so, what else ?
Comment by patrick posted on user gallery at 06/01/2010 - 22:39
ok - against £25 for a foreigner ... what are the other advantages then ?
Comment by patrick posted on user gallery at 06/01/2010 - 22:03
happy new year to everybody ! one question: how comes that some manage to upload more than one photo per day ? (when i can't !)
Comment by patrick posted on user gallery at 06/01/2010 - 19:38
stupid, wasn't it ? computers are odd things ... Peak District = i have often seen photos in english magazines, which i read regularly (i have subscribed to a few ...) = lovely place ! as for Robin Hood, did he really exist ? ... like Rob Roy McGregor (further north !!!:roll ? ... all my youth (in books !) ...
Comment by patrick posted on enlarging photos at 28/12/2009 - 16:26
j'ai trouvé ! what a silly thing ... (english) machines don't like accents on letters in titles - like château - hé - i took them off, and it seems to work now ... not very usefull, i agree, except for non-english people !!! HAPPY NEW YEAR !!!
Comment by patrick posted on enlarging photos at 28/12/2009 - 16:15
in fact, what would be interesting to know - and could be the end of this boring subject ! - is wether you can open them in full or not ?
PS it happens with the last "competition" too ...
PS it happens with the last "competition" too ...
Comment by patrick posted on enlarging photos at 28/12/2009 - 15:48
oddly enough, they all open - but the last three !!! and they all have been uploaded the same way, with no particular order regarding size of picture ! i did latin (many years ago) but have lost it there ...
Comment by patrick posted on enlarging photos at 28/12/2009 - 15:34
[quote:3496ace15f="SteveT"]Patrick
Its not an issue of the size of the jpeg that you shot with but the size that you resized to before posting on the gallery.
I am assuming that you did resize? Otherwise you will be uploading massive files.
in fact, i am not resizing anything: i upload staright as they are ... the last one was 3.34 Mo ... those from k7 over 10 Mo ; and i am afraid i tried to zip them but it hardly does anything on jpeg as you all know ! so ...
Its not an issue of the size of the jpeg that you shot with but the size that you resized to before posting on the gallery.
I am assuming that you did resize? Otherwise you will be uploading massive files.
in fact, i am not resizing anything: i upload staright as they are ... the last one was 3.34 Mo ... those from k7 over 10 Mo ; and i am afraid i tried to zip them but it hardly does anything on jpeg as you all know ! so ...
Comment by patrick posted on enlarging photos at 28/12/2009 - 15:28
well - all photos have been taken with at least K10 at top quality in jpeg - so pretty large files anyway - i don't know if you can check that size from photos on the gallery - but i am not convinced that's the explanation, but i can be wrong ... thanks for answering anyway ! Derbyshire = where is that in England ? (i am a ... froggy ?)
Comment by patrick posted on enlarging photos at 28/12/2009 - 10:04
