All Forum Comments
Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 17/08/2010 - 13:05
Best wishes for the future Simon.
Comment by Oggy posted on A big thank you to all pentaxians at 16/08/2010 - 12:52
Technoblurb wrote:
Glad to provided some puzzlement Oggy it must be the Polish beer.
Sadly, in my case, I think it is more permanent. Glad to provided some puzzlement Oggy it must be the Polish beer.
fatspider wrote:
...As for model aircraft, I always wondered what happpened when they got out of transmitter range, do they just fly off into the sunset? if so it sounds like an expensive hobby
It depends on the model....As for model aircraft, I always wondered what happpened when they got out of transmitter range, do they just fly off into the sunset? if so it sounds like an expensive hobby
Some are very stable and will fly for miles before finding something expensive to crash into.
Others are less stable and will immediately fall out of the sky and hit something expensive.
It shouldn't happen though as radio range is greater than visual range.
Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 14/08/2010 - 11:56
Technoblurb wrote:
What model do you have Oggy
For a moment I got confused there - I used to fly model aircraft and I nearly answered a Wot4 which would have caused confusion.What model do you have Oggy
I have a Panasonic SD204.
Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 13/08/2010 - 22:40
i-Berg wrote:
I'm leaven now...
I'm not going to rise to that.I'm leaven now...
I have had a breadmaker for nearly ten years now. I started making my own bread to avoid the salt but bought the machine because of all the work involved. I wouldn't be without it.
Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 13/08/2010 - 22:16
Mannesty wrote:
Hmmm.I guess we all know that if you don't use x browser(which is the one I use), then you must be a bit challenged. terje-l wrote:
Btw, I am using Internet Explorer 8.
Oh well, never mind. Have you not discovered Firefox yet?Btw, I am using Internet Explorer 8.
For x read IE7/IE8/Firefox/Opera/Wetscrape/machine code/a hollowed out carcass.
I have to laugh just a little as Firefox's spell checker does not recognise "Firefox"
Peter - try to avoid speaking down to people, and they may listen to you.
Comment by Oggy posted on Offensive Adverts at 13/08/2010 - 00:54
Mannesty wrote:
I use a hood, always. Other manufacturers, like Canon, don't supply hoods with any of their lenses.
Depends where you buy from.I use a hood, always. Other manufacturers, like Canon, don't supply hoods with any of their lenses.
Quote:
Is it because their glass doesn't need one? Of course not, it's to make more money for Canon.
Oh dear. You have got it bad.Is it because their glass doesn't need one? Of course not, it's to make more money for Canon.
Quote:
Pentax supplies hoods with most of their lenses, with the exception of the AL (budget) range to keep the cost down.
Correct. Oh, and their FA50s Pentax supplies hoods with most of their lenses, with the exception of the AL (budget) range to keep the cost down.
Comment by Oggy posted on How useful are.... at 13/08/2010 - 00:38
Agreed all points Chris.
Pre-focus may work in situations like a race track when you know more or less where the subject is going to be.
I have taken pictures of the moon and they have not been at infinity.
Pre-focus may work in situations like a race track when you know more or less where the subject is going to be.
I have taken pictures of the moon and they have not been at infinity.
Comment by Oggy posted on Lens Hood for Pentax 55-300 DAL at 12/08/2010 - 12:59
If Steven Fry does it then it cannot be totally pointless.
(Just 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%:wink
(Just 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%:wink
Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 11/08/2010 - 13:01
...Bone density scan coming up again soon too - maybe they will give me a print - lol.
Tony
I failed.