Oggy

Joined: 26th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Oggy
Yes. That was the basis of my post above.

Comment by Oggy posted on Aviation photography at 20/01/2011 - 19:23

Oggy
Not my findings. The year before last I went to Shoreham and a few other shows with the DA*300 and the Sigma 150-500. If I could fill the frame with the 300 then it did produce a better picture than the Sigma, but if the subject was smaller or further away by a significant amount then the Sigma came into it's own. For example, the Lancaster is very large and will easily fill the 300 frame as she passes, but a more interesting picture can be taken as she turns at the end of a pass. This is the most obvious chance to get a bit of "topside".

There is also the consideration that the Sigma has the versatility of a zoom, so if something interesting appears very close, you don't end up with a picture of the pilot's nostrils.

The third advantage of the Sigma is that it focuses faster than Pentax lenses (mine does anyway).

Comment by Oggy posted on Aviation photography at 20/01/2011 - 12:52

Oggy
Try both and see which is better for you. I started learning on seagulls as well.

Comment by Oggy posted on Aviation photography at 19/01/2011 - 22:08

Oggy
I use AF-S on the K20 as AF-C is just not up to the job. I gather this has got better on the K7 and K5.

Comment by Oggy posted on Aviation photography at 19/01/2011 - 21:59

Oggy
[Heretic] All very well, but look at the first comment.

Without the lenses, the best body will come to nought. [/Heretic]

Comment by Oggy posted on My word..Canon owners want into the Pentax system.... at 19/01/2011 - 21:56

Oggy
I don't think the 4-5.6 is available with HSM in Pentax fit Techno. It doesn't suffer much for not having it though.

Chris@SRSWATFORD wrote:
I am off tomorrow at the AP awards...
I trust you are receiving one for the excellent way you look after us Chris.

Comment by Oggy posted on Sigma specials! at 19/01/2011 - 20:45

Oggy
Hardgravity wrote:
They have trolleys around here, but charge for carrier bags.

We take our own on the odd time we call in.
Good man. I think that was the idea. In Ireland many years ago they started charging 10p each and the number used dropped by something like 90%.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 19/01/2011 - 20:12

Oggy
Last year I got the perfect position half way down the runway right on the rails (I paid handsomely for the privilege). Result?


[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/IMGP8224a.jpg[/IMG]

Comment by Oggy posted on Aviation photography at 19/01/2011 - 19:24

Oggy
TOZZA27 wrote:
I refuse to help them in their quest for total retail domination of the country - they represent all that is bad in British business and because of their "points system" probably very expensive to boot.

I would rather be an Asda Walmart man than join them and I can`t afford ( or have nearby ) Waitrose,dislike Morrison`s,find Sainsbury`s expensive too.Lidl,Aldi et al are of no interest - co-op has its moments,and I would rather go to Iran than Iceland !!

I was dragged in by 40 year old child Oggy !!!!!

Tony
I think you committed a tactical error Tony. Had you avoided the child as I did you would be able to afford Waitrose. Saying that they are sadly going down market having developed their own "cheap and nasty" range at the expense of some of their nice things. I still think their business model is more ethical than other large businesses. It's a shame no-one wants quality any more.


greynolds999 wrote:
PS. I'm with Oggy.
(Looks around me bench) Not as far as I am aware.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 19/01/2011 - 15:40

Oggy
thoughton wrote:
You've only been to Tesco one time?
That's only once too many.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 19/01/2011 - 14:56

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo