Oggy

Joined: 26th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Oggy
Likewise thanks Norris.

Comment by Oggy posted on Wanted: Pentax DA 12-24mm at 25/05/2009 - 21:13

Oggy
Thanks for the comments.

Comment by Oggy posted on More Sunsets at 25/05/2009 - 19:35

Oggy
They do appear from time to time, but sell quickly. I had to step back from the last one because I am in negotiations for another one. I have now missed five, one way or another. Good luck.

Comment by Oggy posted on Wanted: Pentax DA 12-24mm at 25/05/2009 - 19:31

Oggy
Anvh wrote:
Thank you for the info.
It's going very off topic now btw ---
It went off topic a bit before I posted. I was trying to dispel some of the myths about batteries and reinforce some of the precautions.

Comment by Oggy posted on In your hands the K-7 vs K10D at 24/05/2009 - 22:28

Oggy
My two pennorth. (30 years served electronics engineer, use a lot of rechargeables in my other hobby - flying model aircraft).

1/. Be careful with Lithium batteries. Charge them using the proper charger, don't short them out and don't physically damage them. The following is an example of an unhappy Lithium battery (albeit a little bigger than the ones in our cameras, the principle is still the same). Clicky.

Although I would not advocate using a different voltage for one moment, there is usually some tolerance. The nature of rechargeables is that when they are fully charged their voltage is somewhat above nominal, but as they discharge they quickly drop back to nominal and stay there for some time, before dropping off. I haven't put a voltmeter across my camera battery, but My RC transmitter has one on the display. It is powered by 8 NiMH cells which give a nominal voltage of 9.6. When first turned on after charging, it is not uncommon to see it reading 11.3V, which it is obviously designed to handle as it is still working after seven years.

Looking at the example above, 2s Li (two Lithiums connected in series) gives 7.4V. 6s NiMH gives 7.2V. In the real world I'd be gobsmacked if the equipment connected to them noticed any difference.

2/. Almost all modern batteries will deliver the current required, so the Amperage is not an issue.

3/. As to the capacity, mAh (milli Amp hours), this simply determines how long you will be able to use the camera between recharges. If your camera operated on 12V, there would be no harm in connecting it to a car battery, typically in the range of 50Ah, or 50,000mAh.


johnriley wrote:
Quote:
So you wouldn't use a Samsung SLB-1674 either? (that is the battery which came with the GX-10 and GX-20).
But we know that this is the same battery, don't we? So this is a spurious point really.
[pedant] No it's not, it has a different label. [/pedant]

Comment by Oggy posted on In your hands the K-7 vs K10D at 24/05/2009 - 21:07

Oggy
MTBF = meantime between failures or how long on average you can expect it to last.

He'll be talking about "tap end of the bath" failures next.

Comment by Oggy posted on Amount of "clicks" at 24/05/2009 - 12:25

Oggy
When you start Photome, at the bottom of the page is the search bar. Left click in this and type shu(tter operations). This will find it for you.

Comment by Oggy posted on Devalued K20D at 24/05/2009 - 11:45

Oggy
Which version of Photome are people using?

The current version (which correctly identifies Sigma lenses) is version 0.79 R17 build 856. If yours is older, it might be worth updating.

Comment by Oggy posted on Some 400mm Tests at 23/05/2009 - 23:15

Oggy
scottthehat wrote:
wow thats weired my 2 170-500mm show up as what they are as does my 150-500mm on photome,
I mentioned this earlier. Photome used to report my 150-500 as a 70-200. A week or so ago I noticed that it is now reporting the correct lens. My initial thought was that it was something that had been corrected by the 1.03 firmware upgrade, but that would not explain why older photos reported the correctly. It has to be an update to Photome.

Comment by Oggy posted on Some 400mm Tests at 23/05/2009 - 20:44

Oggy
[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/Sunset1.jpg[/IMG]

DA*50-135, 50mm F8 1/25th ISO100

[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/Sunset2.jpg[/IMG]

DA 18-55ii, 55mm F8 1/100th ISO200

Both resized from .raw so hopefully exif data intact.

I suspect some cropping would be in order to remove the near black areas.

Any thoughts appreciated.

Thanks for looking.

Comment by Oggy posted on More Sunsets at 22/05/2009 - 21:54

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo