Not wireless though.

It's a freeware .JPG editor. Clicky.

Welcome aboard Phil and thanks for that.

Your ears must have been burning

Curiouser and curiouser.

I agree with Glyn about an identifier code which is translated by whatever software you are using. If it were a text string I would expect the couplets in the lens binary data to be numbers in the 40s and 50s.

You are right Lemmy, that was a different photo. I just grabbed rhe first photo I found taken with the 150-500. The following is from the first photo -

[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/Scndmp2.jpg[/IMG]

It may look slightly different from your screen dump because I did a search for "lens" to compress the relevant stuff. The first and third attempt are correct as is the aperture range but the second is not so sure.

Still a few bugs there then

I think you have an older version of Photome Lemmy. My original version did the same as yours, but after I updated it, it reported the lens correctly -

[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/Scndmp.jpg[/IMG]

If you select "Settings" at the top left side you can select "about" which shows the rev level - mine is 0.79R17 build 856. There is also an "update" option.

A very striking picture. I was with Mike in thinking it had been PPed.

Anything to oblige -

[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/IMGP4030a.jpg[/IMG]

To my mind that doesn't look quite right either because I know the original orientation, and they are now going uphill

Mark - that was my DA*300. They were together until about 50 ft which amazed me.

Thanks for the input.

At wings and wheels today -

[IMG]http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc222/Oggy3323/IMGP4030.jpg[/IMG]

Any thoughts appreciated.

Thanks Lemmy.

It cannot be the lens itself as at least one at least one program (Photome) reports the lens correctly.

Oh those were the days when we thought the Pentax TC was coming