Oggy

Joined: 26th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Oggy
i-Berg wrote:
Oggy wrote:
[quote:3496ace15f="George Lazarette"][quote:3496ace15f="ISO"]G wrote:
Quote:
In general, yes, but I fear I am not always consistent. Sometimes it looks awkward, so I omit it.

G
That should be "not consistent" shirley.
Should we now proceed to split infinitives then?
By all means - go ahead.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 18/05/2010 - 20:38

Oggy
[quote:3496ace15f="George Lazarette"][quote:3496ace15f="ISO"]G wrote:
Quote:
In general, yes, but I fear I am not always consistent. Sometimes it looks awkward, so I omit it.

G
That should be "not consistent" shirley.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 18/05/2010 - 12:38

Oggy
George Lazarette wrote:
Oggy wrote:
(George - see me in my study afterwards for starting a paragraph let alone a sentence with "And".)
Just as learner drivers are not permitted to do certain things, so students of our mother tongue are not permitted to start a sentence with a conjunction.

But once a certain proficiency has been attained, modern grammarians tolerate initial conjunctions. And I would have you know that even good old HGF himself approved the use of an initial conjunction on occasion. Since he is generally regarded as the ultimate authority on these questions, I am happy to commence even paragraphs with conjunctions when the subject of the discussion is clear.

Unless you are yourself confident of your ability to use a conjuction correctly, you should refrain from following my example. Or, in other words, don't start a sentence with And, But, Because, However, Or, Unless, or Since...

Because I am a stickler for correct English, I thought I should make these points clear.

G
Hmmm. The old "Do as I say, not as I do" defence.

I had expected better of you George, but---


Quote:
However, I am sure you are quite capable of conjoining with aplomb.
That's going back a few years.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 18/05/2010 - 07:55

Oggy
George Lazarette wrote:
...And au contraire, mixed gin probably saved the Empire. Tonic water, which I believe used to contain more quinine than it does now, saved many a servant of Empire from malaria.
According to the bottle in my fridge George it still does.

Please can we separate %ABV from proof.

(George - see me in my study afterwards for starting a paragraph let alone a sentence with "And".)

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 17/05/2010 - 22:40

Oggy
Is it full moon?

Comment by Oggy posted on Time to say goodbye at 17/05/2010 - 17:26

Oggy
i-Berg wrote:
Oggy wrote:
sam-joseph wrote:
That's right. No self respecting Aussie would drink that crap. We're all drinking Heineken/Grolsch/Carlsberg etc. these days.
Regards
Self respecting Aussie?

Don't they call them New Zealanders

(Back to the tinmine a bit sharpish!)
Thankyou for taking that in the spirit in which it was intended

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 17/05/2010 - 12:34

Oggy
sam-joseph wrote:
That's right. No self respecting Aussie would drink that crap. We're all drinking Heineken/Grolsch/Carlsberg etc. these days.
Regards
Self respecting Aussie?

Don't they call them New Zealanders

(Back to the tinmine a bit sharpish!)

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 17/05/2010 - 12:18

Oggy
The bags I was thinking of were similar to those in Eastridge's link.

Comment by Oggy posted on Waterproof solutions? at 17/05/2010 - 12:08

Oggy
Anvh wrote:
With the first few metres you've the biggest increase in pressure.
Er No. pressure increases as a linear function of depth (or near enough so as to make no odds). My personal best is 6.2Bar.

They used to make a polythene bag with a glass port which would probably do for 2 metres. but I cannot find a link.

Comment by Oggy posted on Waterproof solutions? at 17/05/2010 - 00:24

Oggy
George Lazarette wrote:
...Interesting, too, about different recipes for English and Irish Guiness. Is your source impeccable? I would have thought that most food regulations come from the EU now, and would apply equally to both countries. Indeed, Ireland might have a case to argue re discrimination. And since most Guiness is exported, I would have expected them to make just one brew for all markets.

But, who knows. Stranger things happen.

G
Not one impeccable source, but many independent ones. I know that Guinness in Irish pubs is different in taste and effect - I prefer the Irish brew to the English one but suffer the day after whereas I do not with the English brew.

I believe the difference may be down to one being Pasteurised and the other not.

As to the aluminium cans, most drinks tend to be acidic and carbonating them makes them more so. The metal is paper thick and the tin would fail quite quickly if it were exposed to the acid.

In a similar way, crown corks are lacquered before they are put on bottles. The taste will instantly tell you if there is a perforation in the lacquer.

Comment by Oggy posted on Another pointless thread at 16/05/2010 - 19:56

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo