All Forum Comments
Comment by nathanever82 posted on wedding photography. at 13/10/2009 - 11:36
Btw, in my 'touring car championship' metaphore, I was wrong in the terms of the metaphore. The OP is comparable to a 16 yld, who has had 3 driving lessons with his dad, and is planning to run a Touring car championship race.
Comment by nathanever82 posted on wedding photography. at 13/10/2009 - 11:25
Comment by nathanever82 posted on For Amin and MikeP at 13/10/2009 - 11:09
talking about Iulus (or Ascanius) son of Aeneas and Creusa, who manage to escape from burning Troy.. and later create Rome...
Comment by nathanever82 posted on For Amin and MikeP at 13/10/2009 - 11:08
Comment by nathanever82 posted on For Amin and MikeP at 13/10/2009 - 10:57
above that it would seem to rise out of
the pyre Eteocles shared with his brother?
He answered me: Within that flame, Ulysses
and Diomedes suffer; they, who went
as one to rage, now share one punishment.
And there, together in their flame, they grieve
over the horse's fraud that caused a breach-
the gate that let Rome's noble seed escape."
(Dante, Canto XXVI, 'the Fraudolent Counselors', v. 52 - 60)
Comment by nathanever82 posted on For Amin and MikeP at 13/10/2009 - 10:57
Comment by nathanever82 posted on PPG 1st :D at 12/10/2009 - 22:29
Just to say, I shot my brother in law's civil function last year. He asked me to shoot, and I did it for free. We also decided to give them an album of photos as wedding present, including 24 large prints (6x and 3-4 A4's.
I probably shot about 400 shots in 1 hour - and I had 2 K10's, 3 flashes (540, 360, af300), 2 lenses for all the focal lenghts (16-50, 50-135, 18-250, 18-55) and 3 primes (31, 50, 100macro). Much memory, and 6 sets of extra batteries.
I don't consider it a proper wedding because there were very few people, and I didn't get paid for the job. THe photos turned out quite decent, and the bride and groom were pleased with the results. Nonetheless, the most shockingly excruciating 2 hours, and many many days of post production. I had 3 years of experience shooting events semi-professionally.
Comment by nathanever82 posted on wedding photography. at 12/10/2009 - 19:52
'Which doesn't mean that he might not produce some good photos btw'
If one takes a few hours to read the DPreview pro- forum, he'll quickly find that the pedantism of most professionals is not only arrogant we-are-the-only-ones-that-can-do-it, but rather, a fair representation of the reality of being a professional photographer.
It really depends what the alternatives are. If the friends can't afford a pro, and are willing to take a chance on the OP, it may be the best option available.
Comment by nathanever82 posted on wedding photography. at 12/10/2009 - 13:34
Its not a matter of undermining somebody's skills, artistic eye, or technical ability. It is simply un-reasonable to suggest the OP to shoot the wedding in my opinion.
Weddings are a huge deal, and unless the OP is ready to put all his energies into professional photography from now, he will not have even 2% of the experience needed to 'guarantee' a successful shoot.
Professional photographers go through years of studying, and training, and shooting weddings with professional equipment and even just supporting as a second, or third photographer. UNless the OP is serious about learning most of the necessary skills by practicing (which by his last post he isn't cause he 'just want to get done with it'), and traning, he has a very good recipe for disaster.
(Which doesn't mean that he might not produce some good photos btw)
I have tried to find assistant jobs in the past 3 years, and its incredibly hard to find even unpaid jobs where you only pull the crowds together for the formals.
Its not a matter of 'everybody has to start somewhere' its a matter of taking responsability.
- Are you fully capable of dealing with all sorts of lighting situations?
- Are you able to expose properly on EVERY SHOT THAT COUNTS - before- during- after the function, and on all the formal shots?
- do you have the appropriate equipment, fast zooms, flashes, backup cameras and lenses, extra batteries.
- Are you completely confident with all your equipment so that you don't have to think about what settings to use, but can concentrate on following the events of the wedding and take the necessary shots. (you don't get second chances on the ring exchange...)
- Are you completely confident you can organise the formal photograph with all the family, and get people to stand the the right place, light, position, and take a well-lit group shot?
- Are you confident in your artistic abilities in order to shoot portraits of the bride and groom that are interesting, if not at least technically acceptable?
- Are you confident that you can take many hours of sweating and running around to catch every important moment?
I could go on for a much much longer list.
And I am really not trying to put you down, its just that unless you have a lot of experience that you haven't mentionned, this task is REALLY very much above your head. To give you a comparison that IMO is sensible: A young driver had his licence for 1-2 years, and has to compete in a touring car championship race. Get what I mean?
PLease don't take professional photography lightly, it really hurts all the hard working pros out there, mainly in the eyes of the couple and their family and friends.
Regards,
Nathan
p.s. You are free to not consider all i've said here above, but remember that helpful advice is not always what you want to hear.
Comment by nathanever82 posted on wedding photography. at 12/10/2009 - 11:28


thank you Shane, much better now!!!!
BTW, where are you located? shall we see if you could meet up with some 'venerable member' and get some free tuition?