MrB

Joined: 29th May 2011

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

MrB
A few more APS-C images from Maidenhead:

6. The road bridge at 40mm:
Comment Image


7. Riverside path under the bridge at 28mm:
Comment Image


8. Brunel's railway bridge at 28mm:
Comment Image


9. Private road but public footpath at 34mm:
Comment Image


Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on HD Pentax D FA 28-105 at 13/09/2016 - 22:36

MrB
McGregNi wrote:

Philip, some good examples at different focal lengths, I think demonstrating that it's a very consistent lens over its range. That close-up at 105mm is good and sharp, and I'm also very pleased with things that close, and with the excellent minimum focus distance as well.

What's happened to the K-S2 ?? It's not ready for relegation yet, surely?! I can understand you might have fancied a go at Pixelshift however .....
Hello Nigel. The K-S2 is a great camera but the K-70 appears to have many of the good features of both the K-S2 and the K-3 series bodies and at a good value price. So I decided to trade in the K-S2 for the K-70. I suppose its all part of the gear addiction syndrome really, and probably an Everest type thing (no, not about double-glazing) - I went for it because it's there and I had some spare cash!

The lens is as pleasing as I thought it might be. For me it covers the focal lengths that I like on APS-C, and I have no plans or intention of getting the K-1. It is similar in size and action to the DA 18-135 and that can give pleasing results, although it can tend to fall off at the edges and corners. I'm hoping I'm correct to expect that the 28-105, being a 135 format lens, will always be presenting the best quality part of the image circle over the smaller rectangle of the APS-C sensor?

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on HD Pentax D FA 28-105 at 13/09/2016 - 17:08

MrB
These are from a stroll yesterday alongside the River Thames at Maidenhead, taken with the 28-105 on the APS-C K-70:

1. The A4 road bridge at 28mm:
Comment Image


2. The A4 road bridge at 68mm:
Comment Image


3. The railway bridge at 48mm:
Comment Image


4. The Brunel plaque on the rail bridge at 105mm - (this is a centre crop of the image, but not quite 100%):
Comment Image


5. Riverside houses between the two bridges at 45mm:
Comment Image


The images were JPEGs from the camera, with some adjustments in PaintShop Pro X8.

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on HD Pentax D FA 28-105 at 12/09/2016 - 19:02

MrB
It seems that the Emperor regularly gets a new set of clothes.

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on Your duds could be worth money! at 06/09/2016 - 17:37

MrB
Wonderful colours, Nigel. My choice of these is number 4.

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on Around Durlston Head at 05/09/2016 - 18:06

MrB
An interesting set. Number 1 for me - good composition, colour and detail. Perhaps too much sky in number 6?

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on North wales narrow gauge at 05/09/2016 - 10:31

MrB
A very nice selection of images, Nigel.

I'm no expert on this (or anything!) but the amount and character of the depth-of-field blur look quite impressive to me. Is that natural or enhanced during PP?

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on First Few from the D FA 28-105 at 05/09/2016 - 10:21

MrB
It is an interesting set and my favourite is number 7 for its composition, colours, contrast and clarity. Perhaps clone out the bit of leaf in the bottom left corner?

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on Ferns at 04/09/2016 - 21:31

MrB
Although I haven't been to a live event, I have been watching some of the repeats of them on the Dave Freeview channel. These images indicate what great fun these races are and my favourites are 3, 4 and 5. They show not only the cars off the ground but also the interest of the crowd in the background. The expression of the driver in 4 is just great, as is the Stig's flat cap in 5!

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on York Micklegate Soapbox Challenge, August Bank Holiday Sunday at 01/09/2016 - 10:53

MrB
Nigel, as Alan has written, people will have differing views and mine agree with David's. The bright object on the right of 1 and 2 draws me away from the rest of the scene, plus I'm not keen on the blurred foreground of 1 and the baseless bush of 2. It might be breaking the conventional rules but it doesn't bother me if there is no centre of interest in a photo, if the scene itself is appealing. So 3 and 4 for me (but I would clone out the bright object from 4!).

Cheers.
Philip

Comment by MrB posted on More from Studland Heath at 01/09/2016 - 10:21

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo