All Forum Comments
Comment by milamber posted on FS: Tamron 18-250mm superb condition / B+W CPL filter at 22/03/2012 - 16:26
I put in on my camera, tried to take it off again and it was stuck. I tried not to panic or force it off, eventually managed. this happened 3 times so I binned it.
I might try another one again, should I avoid the cheapest ones (or not as they're all basically a tube...)?
Basically a tube is a tube, to an extent. No glass to worry about so, in essence, a cheap one should work as well as a more expensive one.
If you are just after a basic set with aperture linkage for use in manual mode then you really don't have to pay much more for quality.
I bought a set of Vivitar AT-22 tubes recently for around £25 delivered and they are often available on Ebay, though £30 delivered is more usual. They are fantastic quality and will last for ever. They feel good to use as well!
Not sure which your camera is, but they might need a little of the anodised black paint removed on the rear to connect properly with a K-x/K-r. It's a simple enough job.
Pentax make a 'K' set, but they don't come up too often and can be quite expensive. They do the same job as the Vivitars, though.
There are a few other clones of the Vivitars around as well for much the same price. All are all metal, with stainless steel connector plates and decent catches.
Comment by milamber posted on Some macros with new lens at 22/03/2012 - 11:55
However No. 2 is the one I'd have hanging on one of my walls! I just love the bleak simplicity of it.
Just assumed I had no eye for a photo at all.........
Comment by milamber posted on For another competition at 17/03/2012 - 15:20
I think they are all very good. If I had taken them I'd probably be most pleased with number 3, but prefer number 2 from an artistic point of view.
That may simply be because I prefer a landscape shot in landscape format. I suspect I'd go for number 3 if it was the same format as number 2!
Chris
Comment by milamber posted on For another competition at 17/03/2012 - 11:25
Comment by milamber posted on Lightweight tripod or no tripod? at 16/03/2012 - 07:38
I wasn't at all happy with my image, but wanted to enter. I couldn't get Corel PSP X2 to produce a traditional vignette in any shape or form - the online tutorials just produced a cut-out with a contrasting coloured background. Even feathering at maximum still left a pretty hard edge.
Having failed with that I went for something different, but that didnt work either! I knew exactly what I wanted to do, but my (lack of) technical expertise with processing let me down.
Never mind, that's what these competitions are for. This time I learned that I can't do vignettes!
Congrats to the winner and looking forward to the next challenge, but no vignettes, please!
Comment by milamber posted on Fortnightly competition 88 entries: vignette in mono at 15/03/2012 - 07:41
Just to emphasise what Trickletreat said above as this was the biggest issue I found when I started using MF lenses :
Focus Confirmation = you can see this in your VF - it is the little green hexagon. When lit it shows you that the subject is in focus. Note however that there is a 'range' (also with AF) so it depends on whether you are focusing from Infinity DOWN to your subject or from minimum focus distance UP to your subject. For each lens one direction will always give sharper shots (and it does vary from lens to lens though for most of mine it is Infinity DOWN to the subject). This is easy to check on the K7/K5 by taking one shot from each direction and then using the side-by-side review mode and zooming in to see which is sharper, do this a few times and you will now be certain which it is.
Take a look at this link too : link
Comment by milamber posted on What is your technique to focus M lenses? at 15/03/2012 - 07:34
Comment by milamber posted on What is your technique to focus M lenses? at 14/03/2012 - 20:59
For all that's good and Holy don't use that most dreadful of products QuickBooks. They seem to have little appreciation of accounting practices and from a software integration point of view it's an appalling mess. You can't have two version of QB on the same PC for development.
Having grappled with it with a client I can see no merit in it whatsoever.
Then again I suppose I might have been having a bad 6 months or take a look at the user forum.
Mike
I'd pretty much come to that conclusion having read the reviews.
Accounting software is supposed to make life easier, but I'm rapidly coming to the conclusion that for a sole trader with no employees and not VAT registered who usually gets paid at the end of a job without any problems then I'd be better off doing it the old fashioned way.
Sage doesn't seem to get much better reviews either, at least the entry level packages.
Just need to dust off my old accounting books!
Comment by milamber posted on Small business accounting software (off topic) at 14/03/2012 - 19:54
Bear in mind that the beep and red square isn't the focus confirmation, at least with my K-r. The green hexagon is the focus confirmation. They are always pretty close, but it might be enough if you are relying on the beep.
Check the diopter for the viewfinder is properly adjusted. If it's clear in the viewfinder, but not in the picture, then that might be the problem.
You could double check using liveview. I often find myself using that, particularly for macro and find it pretty accurate.
Lastly, perhaps use a smaller aperture to give greater depth of field.
All the above is based on my experience with the K-r. It should be pretty general advice, but you might not have liveview, for example, depending on your camera model.
Comment by milamber posted on What is your technique to focus M lenses? at 14/03/2012 - 16:15


Hi, I've recently bought a K-5 with the 18-55mm kit lens. I'm now looking for a general purpose 'travel zoom' and your Tamron 18-250mm sounds about right.
I'm new to Pentax so I'm not too familiar with all the lenses and their history. Is the Tamron basically identical to the Pentax version, apart from branding cosmetics? Is the lens coating the same and will the K-5 body pick up the Tamron lens data correctly?
(I would have sent you a private message but I haven't been registered here for the required 30 days yet. Hopefully you can send a private message to me, otherwise this could be a slow process!)
The Pentax 18-250mm was made by Tamron so they are optically identical. The only differences are in the badging and the type of coating used. I have never seen a review that says that the Tamron coating is in any way inferior to the Pentax one.
I don't believe there would be a significant difference in a good copy of this lens regardless of the badging. Any difference between the lenses would in sample variation, not because of whose name is on it.
I have the Pentax version (which usually sells for a little more than the Tamron one despite everything I said above!) and think it's just about the best travel lens you can get. Others would disagree (especially people who haven't used one), but if you want to cover a long range with excellent image quality you can't go wrong with one of these for travel.
Bottom line is that they are no longer made and still sought after so if you don't get on with it, you won't lose any money when you re-sell, unless you buy at a silly price as they were on Ebay around Christmas time.
I paid £210 delivered for mine, which is about right. If you dig around on my threads there is one with a number of pictures from a trip to Asia last year, all taken with the 18-250mm.