Mike-P

Joined: 25th March 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mike-P
Mannesty wrote:
Glad you got it sorted, good to meet you.
Hope you made sure they didnt give you the duff one to take back to Spain

Comment by Mike-P posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 25/04/2009 - 19:54

Mike-P
sanderscapes wrote:

One thing i noticed is that the zoom is the wrong way round or maybe the right way depending on your perspective the zoom is fully extended at the 16 end rather than the usual 45 end(well usual to me).
The only thing I can think of is that it was designed by a left hander.
Always seemed a bit strange to me.

Comment by Mike-P posted on Pentax 16-45mm at 25/04/2009 - 15:51

Mike-P
Well as you are not selling it on here now I would just like to add that a 99p start ALWAYS works best if you are not doing a buy it now and the item will always find its true value that way (if not more due to bidder fever).

Comment by Mike-P posted on Sigma 10 - 20mm at 25/04/2009 - 15:21

Mike-P
piotro wrote:
It still could be the K10D (or firmware 1.3) way of dealing with SDM, tried same test with 55-300 and it doesn't show that issue.
If that were the case everyone with a K10D and DA*16-50mm up to DA* 300mm would be screaming blue murder (me included).

Comment by Mike-P posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 25/04/2009 - 15:11

Mike-P
I sold probably over 800 phones on Ebay before I moved to Spain and the only one I had a problem with was to France.
I put in a claim to Royal Mail after 4 weeks and told the winner I had done so and they would probably be in touch and like magic the phone arrived the next day. I phoned Royal mail to tell them it had arrived ok and they still sent me a cheque 2 months later to cover the £200 "loss".

Comment by Mike-P posted on shipping ebay items from U.K. to abroad at 25/04/2009 - 12:28

Mike-P
piotro wrote:
And bonus, same stuff with DA 55-300 for comparison.

So is the 60-250mm worth 4 times the price for weather sealing and HSM .. personally from the look of those I would say not.
Besides, my 55-300mm sits nicely in my bag along with the 12-24mm, DA* 16-50mm and Tamron macro.

Comment by Mike-P posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 25/04/2009 - 11:55

Mike-P
I hope we are not going to have a repeat of the DA* 16-50mm fiasco, especially after all the time they have had to get it right.

Comment by Mike-P posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 25/04/2009 - 11:33

Mike-P
johnriley wrote:
If we were the sellers we wouldn't want some of the margins that we would have to sell at.

Surely that depends on turnover.
Tesco make less than pennies on 99% of their items but make huge profits every year. The likes of SRS may not have such a turnover but their margin is no doubt fairly good otherwise they wouldn't still be here.
They make up for that with good customer service (even if their web guru is a total ****** for listing the Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro for Pentax mount when it didn't exist:lol.


Its all relative.

Comment by Mike-P posted on Prices on the Pentax X70 at 25/04/2009 - 11:27

Mike-P
I found Spain very expensive for electrical gear in general so I am very suprised to see that its cheaper there.

Comment by Mike-P posted on Prices on the Pentax X70 at 25/04/2009 - 10:03

Mike-P
Mannesty wrote:


My son has a Canon 70-200L IS f2.8 lens and it is better at 200mm & f2.8 than these images. OK it's a more expensive lens, but the time we have waited for the DA* 60-250, you'd have thought Pentax would have got it right by now.
I wouldnt be happy with those shots either, I did a few sample shots with my Sigma 70-200mm when trying to persuade myself to buy a 60-250mm.
These were handheld @ 200mm f2.8 wide open.

Comment Image


100% Crop.

Comment Image

Comment by Mike-P posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 25/04/2009 - 09:40

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo