All Forum Comments
Comment by McGregNi posted on Failed hard drive at 30/05/2017 - 17:04
I'm actually fortunate that my wife rather likes to grab the K7 (rather roughly at times), and will fire off a few of me once everything is set up. I was very pleased with her efforts on a recent garden shoot, in fact her photos were better than mine (but of course the success was all built on the careful set-up and finely tuned settings :wink.
The set-up used 2 Pentax AF-540FGZ flashes, one off-camera in my softbox to the right of the subjects, and the other on the camera in 'Wireless Master' mode acting as a direct fill. The flash mode was P-TTL with a 1/3 - 2/3 ratio split between the two flashes. There was strong sunlight and a high ambient light level, brought under control with ISO140, F8 and 1/180th sec. The positioning placed the faces in deep shadow with those settings, so the flashes provided the lighting for the faces almost exclusively. The only issue with this particulular frame was the very bright sunlit rim-light on the left side of the faces, but I didn't mind it too much as it seems to add some sparkle ....(?)
Anyway, just wanted to show you that we shouldn't forget to let the camera be turned onto ourselves .... it might just catch something that we will value for a long time
Pentax K7, D FA 28-105, ISO140, F8, 1/180th sec, AF-540FGZ (I & II), P-TTL mode Photo Courtesy of Ms McGregni

Thanks for your views
Comment by McGregNi posted on The Baby and Me at 30/05/2017 - 15:49
No, it's not like that at all! I think that digital technology has revitalised the use of flash, and more sophisticated use of flash as well, by helping us all to see the effects quickly and experiment. Also higher ISOs just mean we can get more power and performance from our flashes without losing the dynamic range and limiting noise for our flash images.
So the better performing cameras actually enhance and go alongside the greater use of flash .... The two are interconnected. Having a new, high performing DSLR is the best excuse for starting out with flash!
Comment by McGregNi posted on A "kicker" for a Cocker at 30/05/2017 - 11:28
Comment by McGregNi posted on A Bunch with the D FA 28-105 at 30/05/2017 - 11:10
And perhaps I should include a special section on the fine and delicate aspects of perfectly supporting your subjects for the photography .... This shoot was originally going to be of the baby ....I was just about to place her carefully balanced on the table, when suddenly my wife noticed and there followed a long burst of shouting (not reproducible here unfortunately) ....well, anyway, at that point I decided to get the flowers and photograph them instead!
Comment by McGregNi posted on A Bunch with the D FA 28-105 at 30/05/2017 - 06:58
Comment by McGregNi posted on A "kicker" for a Cocker at 29/05/2017 - 22:17

Its not soft, but fairly forensic lighting, but it was perfect for revealing the quality of this zoom, which is my go-to lens for so many things now. The flash on the left is the radio controlled Cactus RF60 (fired by the V6 trigger), and on the softbox is the Pentax AF-540FGZ set to SL2 (Optical Slave 2) mode, firing in response to the Cactus flash. Both flashes are using Manual exposure mode. Camera in M also ....
Pentax K7, D FA 28-105, ISO 200, F13, 1/125th





Of course, the cool thing about working with the flashes is that even with these sorts of settings, shooting at ISO200 / F13 in dim light, I can handhold the camera and walk around and zoom in and out at will, framing different parts of the bunch, without a care at all about steadiness!
Comment by McGregNi posted on A Bunch with the D FA 28-105 at 29/05/2017 - 22:10
Comment by McGregNi posted on Pentax on Dr Who? at 28/05/2017 - 18:29
Comment by McGregNi posted on Ripley's turn tonight as my model. at 28/05/2017 - 18:03
It's a good angle with the nose at front, giving a sense of presence and dimension . I think you need a smaller aperture, perhaps 1.5 stops smaller, to pull the eyes fully into focus like the nose.
I'd like to see a crop, without the body, a square crop cut off just below the ears and the top brought down also ...I wonder if that would pack a bit more punch? If you leave it as it is then I think there's a bit too much space at the top.
It's good to see your project still developing!
Comment by McGregNi posted on Ripley's turn tonight as my model. at 28/05/2017 - 14:16


The file explorer interface and system is excellent, it's all very fast and slick. It's probably a good time to move onwards and upwards with your programmed though, and get better, newer 64bit versions. I use a free copy of PhotoShop CS2, which is over 10 years old, runs very well on Win10.