All Forum Comments
Comment by McGregNi posted on Lightroom & Exposure at 16/05/2014 - 19:04
Now Darkmunk, High Speed Sync on the pop-up - now that is something for my wishlist! I agree that would have been a great feature to have here. It would have helped to have been to cut to shutter speed down to , say, 750th or 1000th/ sec and keep control of the sky there. But I had what I had ... for me, I really hate blown highlights generally, and especially large flat areas of overexposed background pulling the eye away from the subject. Here the flash has optimized the exposure for the faces, which was the key-tone. I'm never keen on 'pulling-up' key tones too much.
I'll stick with the B & W, although I thought I might try some extra blurring on the background to reduce the 'bad-bokeh'.
Comment by McGregNi posted on A Black & White Soft Ice at 16/05/2014 - 18:45
I really like this shot but I do agree that the children look a bit detached from the background. In some ways that makes it a bit different.
The bokeh of the tree in the middle looks almost painted on.
I assume you were using the camera's built in flash?
The kids were well exposed by the flash, so needed only a small upwards tweak, plus a big mono contrast boost, but the background sky area was very much blown to the extent that quite a lot of tree detail was lost (giving a few hovering branches!). I really pulled the highlights back massively and this has created the unusual bokeh effects I think as bits of detail poke through where others have gone.
Just for interest I ran the DNG through PDCU without any adjustments ... this effectively gives us a camera JPEG, what some call an 'out the camera' shot ... here's that 'camera' version followed by my mono for comparison :


Hopefully you'll still agree I took the right route with the processing. Certainly it solved a lot of difficult issues of colour and contrast and using the B & W panel colour wheel I could 'dial in' extra contrast and depth to a number of colour tones when converted.
Comment by McGregNi posted on A Black & White Soft Ice at 16/05/2014 - 09:03
I'm interested in trying this flash as a single on-camera solution at first, thinking of building into a small system with a couple more in future. I'm assuming it has an on-board flash measuring sensor in order to work without P-TTL, but I'll have to find some details or an operating manual. I'll update on anything I find out.
Comment by McGregNi posted on Cactus RF60 UK availability? at 16/05/2014 - 08:54
But a websearch has failed to find any available in the UK. I wonder if anyone has any knowledge of this and where to look to source one, and any experience of the flash on Pentax?
Comment by McGregNi posted on Cactus RF60 UK availability? at 16/05/2014 - 02:09
That's a very attractive and natural photo. I also found the background technical info interesting.
David
Great shot and one the girls will treasure in the future
Comment by McGregNi posted on A Black & White Soft Ice at 15/05/2014 - 20:21
What a lovely family, Nigel. A perfect moment captured for ever.
I've never got to grips with fill-flash tending err on the side of caution, often not using enough power. This one certainly fills all of the shadows, giving the little girls a stark almost cardboard cut-out character. They certainly stand out from the defocused background.
(Word to the wise, although perhaps too late for you, having only one boy solves the short change crisis!)
I've checked the exif for this one, and it was at f6.3, +0.3 flash exposure at 35mm, 180th/sec. I usually set fill-flash to -0.7 or -1.0, but here the meter was fighting very bright open sky behind, so after a few previous shots I had settled on +0.3.
I didn't say before, but this was with the 18-55 WR AL zoom, the one that came out with the K7 back in 2009. Its generally regarded as the pick of the 'kits', and certainly its IQ stands up and is very useful for many situations.
Comment by McGregNi posted on A Black & White Soft Ice at 15/05/2014 - 18:34
The mono arose out of experimentation really - I was having trouble in colour with the very strong backlighting (the shot is fill-flashed) causing washed out tones, and contrast was a nightmare, so I opened it in Lightzone and tried the B & W panel, and was pleased with the results. Thanks for taking a look.

Comment by McGregNi posted on A Black & White Soft Ice at 15/05/2014 - 09:09
My preferred editor, Sagelight, has a number of buttons to switch between these different modes, making it easy to control (and make a mistake!) - I don't know the LR interface, but its worth checking there's nothing buried deep somewhere.
Comment by McGregNi posted on Help! Lightroom at 14/05/2014 - 23:30
Comment by McGregNi posted on Llandudno Transport Festival 2014 at 13/05/2014 - 20:58


Camera sensors record data in a way that is optimized for the sensor (ie the best distribution of tones to store the maximum image information). This is not the same as the best way to view a photograph ... an editors job is to redistribute the sensor data in a way that better represents the brightness tones as the eye sees it. Auto functions (as you're using) will use an algorithmic approach to this, producing a tighter histogram with more tones bunched together in the mid to upper region - this produces the small exposure increase for the majority of shots, but it will also usually increase overall contrast (spreading the tones wider).
As dougf8 said, best to take firmer control and ensure your brightness and contrast is ideal for each image - auto functions will not be suitable for many non-'conventional' exposures.