All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Q 06 15-45mm examples at 08/10/2012 - 08:55
As long as you don't power off the Q you have the option when playing back the last image too. There's a hint that appears
As soon as you power off, the option to save RAW is gone.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on At sea with a Q- much more than just another compact! at 03/10/2012 - 14:18
The closest pair are shots 1 and 5, but shot 1 is K5II with 50-135, while shot 5 is K5IIs with 16-50
That said, the K5IIs certainly does have more bite and detail!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Sample shots from both the K-5 II and IIs. Shame they're not directly comparable. at 03/10/2012 - 11:57
I recently bought a Raspberry Pi and am going to attach it to an external hard drive to make it into a cheap NAS
In the end I switched to an IoMega Firewire-800 drive on the Mac
That's much better
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Backup Programs for Photos at 03/10/2012 - 11:52
The other trouble with packing everything into a single compressed storage file is that errors on the drive could potentially make it very difficult to recover everything (i.e. you may lose more than you bargained for).
Copying individual files with a synchronisation tool also allows for quick access to any file or group of files. For example, culling unwanted files is easy when stored as files, but may require twice as much space for a compressed system (e.g. ZIP file compression normally requires that everything be unzipped, and the wanted files rezipped to a new file, and finally the old file removed).
HTH!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Backup Programs for Photos at 02/10/2012 - 15:22
Lets you do what you want. Have used it for merging changes on three drives before!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Backup Programs for Photos at 30/09/2012 - 23:13
In fact I use BeyondCompare for all directory sync, version control and diff operations. Even use it on Mac (with PlayOnMac)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Backup Programs for Photos at 30/09/2012 - 21:05
MattMatic - lens is DFA 100mm WR macro
Didn't shoot macro that much, and use the DA*50-135 now and that's hardly ever a problem in any setting.
PF isn't such an issue in macro settings
LR4 is now £99, and I think the upgrade is £59 - which isn't bad at all! Unfortunately, I don't have any SMC-F 100mm images to hand to check whether it'll automatically and completely remove PF
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Removing PF with Elements 10 or LR3 at 30/09/2012 - 17:30
MattMatic - too much PF in my shots, and too little patience I'm afraid.
PF is a function of lens & sensor, and often a function of aperture too. (My DA*16-50 suffers from transverse CA at apertures wider than f/4)
I'm really looking for a silver (purple) bullet solution that'll sort it out across the entire shot with one press of a button.
(Note it's not in LR4, but only LR4.1)
Actually the CA removal features in LR4.1 I find to be superb (read: the best I've used). If the lens is a profiled one, then axial CA is removed automatically, while transverse CA and blooming is removed with a dropper approach. The DA12-24 and DA*16-50 clean up fantastically and actually increase sharpness - because it's processed at the RAW stage!
The only thing I can say is to Google for different methods that would fit your workflow.
Failing that, work with B&W contra jour
e.g. http://forums.steves-digicams.com/editors-photoshop-vegas-final-cut-pro-kdenlive...#b
and http://powerretouche.com/Color-fringe_tutorial.html
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Removing PF with Elements 10 or LR3 at 30/09/2012 - 16:24
1. Add a new layer
2. Change layer blend mode from Normal to Colour
3. Pick a soft brush, about the size of the PF, Alt-click to sample colour nearby and paint over
That'll get rid of it
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Removing PF with Elements 10 or LR3 at 29/09/2012 - 22:35


http://www.pentax.jp/japan/products/q10/ex/
Matt