All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Basic Colour Management: C1 & PS at 24/04/2009 - 17:06
There are two types of monitor ICM/ICC file
There's the "regular" matrix/shaper type, and there's cLUT (Colour Look Up Table)
If the display behaves well then a matrix/shaper will do the job. This is the type generated in ArgyllCMS with "dispcal" (and quite likely by other colour profiling software).
The alternative is a cLUT type ICC file. This takes a bit more work to produce - ArgyllCMS certainly can do this (see the "Two Step" process in the docs). However, not all applications can handle the cLUT type tables
Still, it would appear from my initial checks that Silkypix does At the moment I now have Silkypix, Lightroom, Photoshop and Firefox (with sRGB non-ICC-tagged images) all looking the same and showing all shades! Hooray!
I'm just trying to get to grips with the remaining minor problems (it may just be that FF isn't cLUT aware, but only matrix/shaper). Hopefully I can put together a step-by-step guide on getting a reasonable calibration & profiling
Certainly my old Tosh is showing images better than it ever did before!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Basic Colour Management: C1 & PS at 24/04/2009 - 14:55
There's some great info here: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/technology/lens_terms.html
DA = Digital format. Probably won't work correctly on film bodies
ED = Extra low dispersion elements (see link)
(IF) = Internal focus (see link)
AL = Aspherical elements (see link)
SDM = Supersonic Drive Motor (if I remember correctly). Some SDM lenses are SDM-only (like the DA17-70). Others have both body-drive focus & SDM (e.g. DA*16-50, DA*50-135)
Limited lenses = no expense spared
Have a good search around on http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/index.html
Hope that helps a bit!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Novice, basic lens questions? at 24/04/2009 - 14:45
I don't think they bother writing virri/trojans that run on W98SE anymore :LOL:
It's hard to find AV software that works on pre W2k (though Eset used to until just now). Then there are all the TCP/IP stack issues (buffer overruns, DNS pollution attacks, etc, etc) that just haven't been fixed in pre XP.
I'd be fine if a 98 machine wasn't on the 'net... but I wouldn't connect it to the big bad wide world out there
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on New Pentax camera? at 24/04/2009 - 11:38
According to the diagram you should have:
2 x 50nF (0.05uF)
1 x 10uF
2 x 5nF (0.005uF)
1 x C (see document). 500nF (0.5uF) will give up to about 0.5s pause
1 x 1M resistor
4 x 22k resistor
1 x 1k resistor
1 x 1M variable resistor
Hope that helps!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on any electronics boffins out there? at 22/04/2009 - 13:59
It's just the kind of caps that you buy over the counter will be a polarised 10uF. I know you can buy a 10uF non-polarised... if you look hard enough.
But the OP will not have a problem - the 10uF is just a supply smoothing cap and whether it is polarised or not is not important (and so polarised is certainly not a problem). That's all I was getting at
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on any electronics boffins out there? at 22/04/2009 - 13:21
Sure, I can engineer a situation to make CA show up big time. However, I can do that on almost every lens I have. Really, the 16-45 isn't a problem. You'll see it if you "pixel peep".
The current new price of around £200 is a steal for the 16-45
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on 16 - 45 and CA and options at 22/04/2009 - 12:56
I didn't know Mr Muscle did lens testing
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Here at last! - DA* 60-250 at 22/04/2009 - 12:53
You may have a problem - looking at the circuit, none of them should be polarised.
And yes, marked as "63V" means that's its maximum safe working voltage.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on any electronics boffins out there? at 22/04/2009 - 12:51
It seems crop factor, focal length and field-of-view are difficult concepts to explain with words alone. Is there a series of good diagrams on the web to make it all clearer?
http://www.photon.me.uk/matt/cameras/pentax/istd_focal.htm
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Wide angle question/favour at 21/04/2009 - 12:11


Can I ask why is it - if you don't need to re-visit your monitor calibration once done - that Huey insists that you re-calibrate every two weeks?
However, in practice you can normally get away with a lot less (depending on how critical your colour work is). There's normally an option in the software to choose the interval. The ColorVision Spyder 2 Pro has the option (but it's not obvious).
Failing that it may be possible to remove the notification process...
All that kind of messing about is one reason I switched to ArgyllCMS - it gave me much better profiling than anything else I've ever used. And with the new info I'm getting (although complex) it's increasing the quality even more
Matt