All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Avid Pentax user's tragic demise at 04/09/2006 - 22:34
Regards,
Comment by Mannesty posted on mini softbox at 04/09/2006 - 22:49
In my opinion it's not quite accurate to tag your flash with the generic label. As far as your camera is aware, the 'dedicated' module appears just like a Pentax badged flash unit. It follows then that any flash trigger/receiver would treat it, or need to treat it, the same.
Now I've been giving this radio business some thought and it occured to me that, if it is simple enough to transmit a signal to cause the flash to fire (send start signal), it ought to be equally simple to send the quench signal (send stop signal) too. After all, both signals are initiated by the camera.
Taking that further, as third party flashes need a 'dedication' module to suit the camera they are used with, so would any radio transmitter/receiver solution.
I haven't found one . . . yet.
In fact, its occured to me (OK, you all new anyway) that flashes only ever receive command signals, they don't transmit them. About the only signal I can think of that a flash sends is its readiness to operate, which in radio terms can safely be ignored . . . I think ! ! !
Comment by Mannesty posted on Off camera flash at 01/09/2006 - 20:55
Comment by Mannesty posted on Off camera flash at 01/09/2006 - 10:09
The radio triggers are not all cheap, I'm sure if you look around you can find some that cost many hundreds of pounds. I'd have thought that around £10/£15 for one of the chinese ones was worth the risk and ought to simplify the deployment of your flash when you actually need to.
If you wanted to go the hot shoe grip route, you'll also have a psuedo-hammerhead which might be useful.
I would have thought, though I haven't done it myself, that it is easy enough to make an extension cable of just about any length you want as long as the signal voltages don't drop too much that the flash doesn't work.
The hot shoe grip comes with a cable having I think 4 conductors. Companies like Radio Shaack, RadioSpares (RS Components) probably can supply a male/female 4 connector in-line plug/socket of small enough size. Then you need 2 pairs of these, cut the hotshoe grip cable and rejoin it with one pair of plug/socket. Make you extension lead with another pair, then simply join them all together when you need to mount your flash remotely. Ethernet cable has 4 shielded/twisted pairs of wires in it. You could use one pair for each contact to reduce the overall resistance of the cable. If you can find a 5Mtr Ethernet Patch cable, it'll be flexible enough.
Personally, I would go for the radio trigger but I doubt that you would keep the TTL functionality that you would retain with the hard-wired solution.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Off camera flash at 30/08/2006 - 09:28
Assuming you want the flash to be 5Mtrs away from the camera, you might consider a slave trigger attached to the remote flash, and a smaller flash (to trigger the slave) attached to the camera. That'll do 5Mtrs easily but both guns will contribute light to your compostion. There are radio flash triggers available too where you fit a transmitter to the camera and a receiver to the flash. Search ebay for flash trigger, they mostly come from Hong Kong for about £10.
If you want a pseudo-hammerhead arrangement, where the flash is still attached to the camera, but moved a few inches away to avoid red-eye, the Pentax hotshoe grip is what you need. It comes with a bracket and connecting lead.
Regards,
Comment by Mannesty posted on Off camera flash at 29/08/2006 - 17:35
A change of procedure that develops into a habit, or even paranoia, is the best option in my opinion.
In summary, if the camera can be improved or changed, it probably will be. The same may not be true of the operator.
Comment by Mannesty posted on ISO Setting Reminder at 30/08/2006 - 19:43
It was rather magnificent. The only thing that really surprised me was the relatively tiny size of its eyes but hey, it made up for it in the ear department After a while of just sitting on my lens it seemed to get quite comfortable and folded its antennae around the side of its head and under its wings. Fascinating creature.
I have an aunt who is absolutely terrified of moths . . . but I couldn't be that cruel . . . to the moth
I only wished I'd had my SMCP-FA 100mm macro lens and the incredible AF140C (thanks for that) with me but I think the Vivitar did a pretty good job and I'm quite pleased with the lighting anyway.
Cheers,
Comment by Mannesty posted on Hover Fly at 31/08/2006 - 22:54
To give it some scale, the lens is a 12-24mm DA with a 77mm filter.

*istD, Vivitar Series 1 70-200 Macro, AF500FTZ + Stofen, f8, 1/125, Iso 200 AWB
Comment by Mannesty posted on Hover Fly at 31/08/2006 - 21:47


He was most unfortunate to have been hit in the chest by the ray's barbed tail which apparantly pierced his heart. Anywhere else and he'd still be with us, in pain, but still alive.
Its most unikely that any of his friends & family are members of this forum but my condolences to them.