All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Recommend me a tripod please ! at 26/09/2006 - 12:28
Comment by Mannesty posted on Hammerhead question(s) at 24/09/2006 - 12:11
Comment by Mannesty posted on Do you adjust your camera's jpeg processing settings? at 26/09/2006 - 11:50
I tend to keep mine set to default (middle) setting because I know I can adjust them on a frame by frame basis when I get them home.
If you want to adjust them 'in the field', your decision needs to be on a frame by frame basis too which is another reason for using RAW because that's 3 fewer on-camera settings to get wrong, potentially.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Do you adjust your camera's jpeg processing settings? at 24/09/2006 - 09:35
I am a firm supporter of modern cameras 'intelligent' electronics . . . as long as it can be turned off. My preference then is for centre-spot focus, average or centre-weighted metering, and either fully manual or aperture priority for exposure. Oh, and RAW mode, so that I have some latitude for exposure errors (mine, not the cameras).
Comment by Mannesty posted on Multi or single point focus? at 24/09/2006 - 09:28
My:-
SMCP(K)1:1.2 weighs 417 grams (including caps and filter).
SMCP-M 1:1.4 weighs 250 grams (including caps - no filter).
SMCP-A 1:1.7 weighs 193 grams (including caps and filter).
SMCP-F 1:1.7 weighs 243 grams (including caps and filter).
The 1.2 has a 52mm filter thread compared to 49mm on the other two which also might influence your decision.
The 1.2 is certainly weighty but oh so lovely.
Whichever you decide, if its a good one, you'll not be disappointed. If you need that extra bit of speed for night shots, the 1.4 is an excellent choice.
Comment by Mannesty posted on SMC 50MM 1:2 and 1:1.7 Comparison at 23/09/2006 - 18:26
The Pentax istD was twice as expensive as the Canon 300D.
Some would argue, me included, that the Pentax *istD is a far superior camera in terms of build quality, ergonomics, and functionality and therefore worth at least twice the price of the 300D. Certainly, if you had a lens collection of more than 2 or 3 at the time you were buying, the *istD would have been a much cheaper option overall.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Why did you buy a Pantax? at 24/09/2006 - 12:04
Before buying an SLR I used a Petri 7 Rangefinder camera which I have recently been reuinited with. My dad had kept it for years and guess what, it still works a treat. Totally manual and not a battery in sight. The metering relies on a CDs cell which surrounds the lens. Unfortunately it has been dropped at some point in its long life and the filter thread is wrecked.
After the demise of my Super-A I used Fujifilm compacts until I discovered that Pentax had produced a long awaited digital body that my existing lens collection would work with. I now have 2 X *istD bodies, and an MZ-S.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Why did you buy a Pantax? at 23/09/2006 - 09:32
One of the most versatile Pentax guns I have used is the AF-280T. It lacks trailing curtain and high speed synch, nor does it offer focus assist but otherwise its an excellent gun with a bounce and swivel head, TTL and manual modes.
One very important question you must ask about second hand flashes is the condition of the battery compartment and its cover. Many occasional users often leave batteries in them which eventually leak and can cause significant corrosion.
There are of course many third party flashes having Pentax dedication which will also work with you camera but my recommendation is to buy Pentax.
Comment by Mannesty posted on MZ30 flash compatibility at 23/09/2006 - 09:05
Comment by Mannesty posted on New Pentax Lenses announced today 21 Sept 06 at 21/09/2006 - 13:21


This may seem a simple and obvious question but the answer is far from simple.
I use a Manfrotto 055PROB + spiked feet + 488RC2 ball head for studio & general type work. For carrying about I use a Manfrotto 190D + 438 leveller + 484RC2 ball head and a Manfrotto 679 Monopod + 234RC head.
I like to use the 055PROB setup most because it is so versatile. The centre post can be removed and refitted so that it is parallel to the ground plane. This makes top down shots much simpler and keeps the tripods legs out of shot. This is a pretty heavy tripod though, too heavy for me to want to carry it about all day but it is rock solid, and a dream to use. You will need a tripod similar to this if you want to take shots at near to ground level. Otherwise you'll need to buy a second centre column and cut it to length.