All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on A new film camera please! at 21/07/2009 - 23:56
This size difference makes them smaller, lighter, and cheaper to produce, yet doesn't compromise image quality.
This point alone, even if relative IQ's were identical, would mean Canon lenses will be more expensive than equivalent focal length Pentax lenses.
And another thing, Canon glass is expensive . . . because there are enough people around who are still prepared to pay. Whether they need it or not, or have the knowledge to use it, is food for a different topic.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Is the K7 already flawed? at 21/07/2009 - 23:52
. . . the problem is that it can only focus when the mirror is up . . .
Actually I've never used this mode so I'm preparing myself to be shot down in flames . . .
Comment by Mannesty posted on AF.C focusing, full explanation please at 21/07/2009 - 23:29
[quote:3496ace15f="Pwynnej"]
Park Cameras have increased their price by only 50 pounds
Looks like I'll be doing business with Park Cameras.
Exemplary pre and post sales service counts for nothing it seems and price is the only consideration to some. Hence the proliferation of box shifters.
Shame.
Or, dare I say it, we on the forum are blessed with 'good' service from SRS because of our familiarity with them and people (one previous forum member excepted) have nothing but good to say about them?? A slight aside at SRS, twice I sent enquiries by email, they were slow to respond and lost one sale as a result....
Peter[/quote]Not at all but having spent a lot more money with SRS, and any issues I've had have been resolved instantly and without question, they are still my preferred supplier.
My comment was about the current trend of choosing a supplier purely on price and ignoring the pre and after sales service if it should become necessary to use it.
I had 2 duff DA* 16-50 lenses in succession, both replaced very rapidly, and my current one is excellent. I had a small problem with an AF540FGZ flash, the lock preventing the head from tilting downwards from the horizontal didn't work, again it was replaced without question.
I also know that if you call Chris, he will always give the best deal he can and usually a bit lower than their web price and he gives us free shipping. But you have to call, he's not going to advertise that here.
Truth is a lot of people buy from them, therefore their stock turns over more rapidly. He buys as much stock as he can when he knows the price will go up, just to keep his price down for as long as possible. Eventually of course, that stock runs out and the new stock is at the higher price.
Comment by Mannesty posted on SRS, K20D one of dearest on-line now? at 21/07/2009 - 23:20
i want something that is similar to the k10d i.e.
* use the same lenses like ones i have listed below
* can be uses fully automatic (i can't do manual )
* is reasonably cheap i.e. less than £50 for body only
There are other bodies to consider like the MZ-7, MZ-5, & MZ-5N. I think only the MZ-6 can use the wireless and P-TTL capabilities of the AF360/540FGZ flashes and some other third party flashes (Metz & Sigma).
If you want a really small camera, look at the *ist film body, but it might be more than £50.00 and it has a 'crippled' K mount preventing full use of older lenses prior to the SMCP-A series.
Comment by Mannesty posted on A new film camera please! at 21/07/2009 - 17:31
Park Cameras have increased their price by only 50 pounds
Looks like I'll be doing business with Park Cameras.
Exemplary pre and post sales service counts for nothing it seems and price is the only consideration to some. Hence the proliferation of box shifters.
Shame.
Comment by Mannesty posted on SRS, K20D one of dearest on-line now? at 21/07/2009 - 16:10
Oh, and the MZ-6 can use pre-A series lenses, unlike the MZ-60.
Comment by Mannesty posted on A new film camera please! at 21/07/2009 - 16:00
The average size of DNG on K-7 is about 2/3 that on K20D.
We know the K20D was uncompressed DNG so I susspect that K-7 is storing compressed DNG - this may already be smaller than the PEF.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Using K-7 with CS3 query at 21/07/2009 - 09:25
There was a world before ebay . . . it was just a bit more time consuming.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Ebay at it again! at 20/07/2009 - 09:27
Price: £1,298.99 (Including VAT at 15%)
Comment by Mannesty posted on K-7 Twin lens kit at 20/07/2009 - 09:23


You say you "can't do manual" and "can it be used fully automatic" . . . so how exactly are you going to learn about exposure?
Stick with the DSLR, your learning curve will be much steeper with some help from this forum.