Mannesty

Joined: 17th February 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mannesty
I don't like it, I think it's hideous, horrible. I mean . . . a black wall . . . in a kitchen ! ! !

The lillies though, are beautifully shot and a credit to the photographer. This is a well thought out image, if expensive at £4.50 a stem, expertly executed.

Comment by Mannesty posted on yellow lillies at 17/08/2010 - 12:55

Mannesty
I just came across this. No 58mm/f2 in there though.

I thought it fair to post as it's on BIN or BO.

Comment by Mannesty posted on One for the Spotmatic/Takumar fans at 17/08/2010 - 12:33

Mannesty
1: If you are not getting focus confirmation at infinity, either your subject is not at infinity, or the lens/camera/combination is faulty or in need of adjustment.

2: You can check if SR had stabilised by looking at the EXIF of a suspect image using Photome.

I suggest contacting SRS at your earliest opportunity.

Comment by Mannesty posted on 43 Limited Possible Problem. at 16/08/2010 - 14:24

Mannesty
I think this question has been asked prior to each imminent arrival of a new body. The one 'wish' that has always been asked for is a better, faster, AF system. We still don't have it yet. Will we get it on the next body? Let's hope so.

For the moment, I'm happy with my K20D's but any and all of the above requests would be on my wish list.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Whats new at 15/08/2010 - 12:27

Mannesty
Congratulations, and I'm only sorry I don't need any of the kit you have on offer.

Which model is the 50mm 1:1.4?

Comment by Mannesty posted on For sale: K20D + D-BG2 grip, various Pentax lenses, AF-360FGZ flash & accessories at 13/08/2010 - 20:10

Mannesty
Oggy wrote:
Mannesty wrote:
I use a hood, always. Other manufacturers, like Canon, don't supply hoods with any of their lenses.
Depends where you buy from.
Does it? So where can you buy Canon branded lenses with UK warranty with hoods included by Canon (not the dealer)?

Oggy wrote:
Mannesty wrote:
Is it because their glass doesn't need one? Of course not, it's to make more money for Canon.
Oh dear. You have got it bad.
I don't have anything bad, whatever 'it' is. I like Canon cameras, some of 'em anyway. I like Canon glass too. But I really like Nikon kit. My next system will most likely be a FF body from Canon or Nikon together with a couple of good fast zooms covering the 24mm to 200mm range because I think Pentax will continue to disappoint us on the AF issues surrounding their bodies and SDM lenses, particularly in low, but otherwise usable, light.

Oggy wrote:
Mannesty wrote:
Pentax supplies hoods with most of their lenses, with the exception of the AL (budget) range to keep the cost down.
Correct. Oh, and their FA50s
I'd forgotten about that one.

Comment by Mannesty posted on How useful are.... at 13/08/2010 - 01:21

Mannesty
davem wrote:
Pentax sell the Al lenses without hoods so is it only expensive glass that needs the hood:
I use a hood, always. Other manufacturers, like Canon, don't supply hoods with any of their lenses.

Is it because their glass doesn't need one? Of course not, it's to make more money for Canon.

Pentax supplies hoods with most of their lenses, with the exception of the AL (budget) range to keep the cost down.

Comment by Mannesty posted on How useful are.... at 13/08/2010 - 00:22

Mannesty
johnriley wrote:
I haven't seen a review, but I'm using one very successfully anyway!

As for prices, they have certainly tumbled.
Google for "Pentax I10 reviews". Most of them report that the lens produces poor sharpness towards the edges of the frame, and poor noise control from ISO 400 and above.

This review is fairly typical.

Comment by Mannesty posted on I-10 vs 110 at 13/08/2010 - 00:15

Mannesty
Sledge hammer solution to crack a wlanut problem I think. I wouldn't bother. Go buy a Logitech web cam for not much money rather than tie up an expensive DSLR + lens.

Comment by Mannesty posted on K7 as a web cam at 12/08/2010 - 23:47

Mannesty
jackitec wrote:
. . . anyway Play.com had an offer on it last week for 99 pounds . . .
£119.99 for a black one and £183.15 for a white one? Go figure . . . I can't, and the reviews aren't encouraging either.

Comment by Mannesty posted on I-10 vs 110 at 12/08/2010 - 23:40

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo