All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Specsavers at 18/08/2010 - 22:21
It is interesting you should say that Peter. I know at least three people who went there and their "corrected" eyesight is worse than mine which isn't great.
I am going to have to face up to the need for glasses soon, but I have no idea where to get them from.
{Anyone saying an optician will be tweaked.)
I think an error was made in my sight test measurements, I just need another test to prove it. I have no doubt that my glasses have been made to the prescription because they've been measured and the results agree, but if the prescription is wrong . . .
Comment by Mannesty posted on Specsavers at 18/08/2010 - 07:01
It is interesting you should say that Peter. I know at least three people who went there and their "corrected" eyesight is worse than mine which isn't great.
I am going to have to face up to the need for glasses soon, but I have no idea where to get them from.
{Anyone saying an optician will be tweaked.)
I think an error was made in my sight test measurements, I just need another test to prove it. I have no doubt that my glasses have been made to the prescription because they've been measured and the results agree, but if the prescription is wrong . . .
Comment by Mannesty posted on Specsavers at 17/08/2010 - 22:43
Out of curiosity what do you actualy mean by softer images?
That's softness.
It's a bit like an image being slightly out of focus, but not.
The softness of some lenses, including the FA 50mm 1:1.4, is often used in portrait photography. It helps hide some of the imperfections found in the skin, particularly of older people.
Let's face it, if you had a portrait shot done, you probably wouldn't want to have every pore showing up.
That's softness.
Pentax even made a 'soft' portrait lens, three actually. Check out the three 85mm lenses here.
Comment by Mannesty posted on F or FA 50mm 1.7? at 17/08/2010 - 20:27
I got 'Elite' varifocals, anti-glare coating, and reactions. No b****y use though. They are perfect for close work, but I can't see a thing long distance. Should've gone . . . somewhere else.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Specsavers at 17/08/2010 - 20:19
Anyway I got a pro to check the camera over (thanks Mr Bridge ) and he confirmed that the shutter button is faulty.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Shutter clicks twice at 17/08/2010 - 15:07
I've had the F f/1.7 and the FA f/1.4. The F f/1.7 was sharper at every aperture than the FA f/1.4.
You need to compare apples with apples.
Comment by Mannesty posted on F or FA 50mm 1.7? at 17/08/2010 - 15:02
What's the difference?
I thought the A meant autofocus . . .
That said, your lens is a very sharp lens and will work fine on a DSLR.
The 'A' you refer to is on the aperture ring and denotes that it has an Auto diaphragm setting, meaning the aperture is set by the body when the aperture ring is set to 'A', and not an 'f' number.
Comment by Mannesty posted on SMC PENTAX-F 1:1.7 50mm autofocus at 17/08/2010 - 14:50
Comment by Mannesty posted on yellow lillies at 17/08/2010 - 14:33
MODS: Change the thread title please to avoid any potentail confusion/misrepresentation.
Comment by Mannesty posted on SMC PENTAX-F 1:1.7 50mm autofocus at 17/08/2010 - 14:00

