Medium Format 645D

K10D
Posted 11/09/2010 - 13:41 Link
Previously posted from Qatar.

BUT, we did not have an MF camera then!

link

Look at the images and be inspired.....

Regards
Too far from a shore.
Edited by K10D: 11/09/2010 - 13:41
johnriley
Posted 11/09/2010 - 14:02 Link
What has this got to do with the Pentax 645D? :
Best regards, John
Algernon
Posted 11/09/2010 - 14:16 Link
What has this to do with anything
Links to a Zucchero track
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
K10D
Posted 11/09/2010 - 14:17 Link
OK, question is relevant.

The size of the images on the video imply that they were taken with a MF camera.

For the majority of of current forum members, they have not used film or MF/LF cameras.

The intention was to motivate the photographer. Producing such large size images is not a "done deal" with small format.

Now that the 645 will be available, I deemed it relevant that the link was worth a re-post.

Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Edited by K10D: 11/09/2010 - 14:17
johnriley
Posted 11/09/2010 - 14:24 Link
So basically it has nothing to do with the 645D - the idea is tenuous at best - professionals have been producing images like that from 35mm since the 1960s.
Best regards, John
Mannesty
Posted 11/09/2010 - 14:26 Link
K10D wrote:
Now that the 645 will be available . . .
From where does this information originate? Available? Where?
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
K10D
Posted 11/09/2010 - 14:46 Link
Wow!

Correct, nothing directly linking the 645D. Who will go out and buy a 645 film.

The "soft" (by forum response)link is in the image sizes on the video.

johnriley wrote:
So basically it has nothing to do with the 645D - the idea is tenuous at best - professionals have been producing images like that from 35mm since the 1960s.
I do not accept this as protocol John. Large output images would primarily be the result of MF cameras.

I do not dispute the 35mm capabilities but what would you use given the task?

Mannesty wrote:
K10D wrote:
Now that the 645 will be available . . .
From where does this information originate? Available? Where?
I apologise for this......Planet Earth? Locally Japan.

If you want it that bad, it's a flight away.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
johnriley
Posted 11/09/2010 - 15:12 Link
Quote:
I do not dispute the 35mm capabilities but what would you use given the task?
To be fair, not being privy to what the task was that can be rather hard to answer. I would not be surprised if the shots were medium format, or even large format, but there's nothing to indicate that they were.

Nowadays for serious huge professional images, maybe even a DSLR. I've seen some images at Focus on Imaging even from the Sigma SD14 that have been as large as those in the video.

Ultimately it depends on the use, the size required and the viewing distance.
Best regards, John
K10D
Posted 11/09/2010 - 15:43 Link
Agreed John.

I would use MF or LF.

I have a FF DSLR and would not use the 25M pixel version if the work required large print output.

But that is my work flow choice.

Heck, if a full sized body scanner produced a usable image?

Still sniffing for a 645D, and may NOT sell it on.

Best regards
Too far from a shore.
Don
Posted 11/09/2010 - 16:12 Link
most billboards around here were shot on medium format film and scanned, or with d-slrs and interpolation software...
and at viewing distances, you can't tell which was which....
very few outfits outside the major metropolitan cities are profitable enough to justify medium or large format digital....

for the price of the 645d, I could have my vehicle tricked out and painted with custom company graphics, and it will draw more customers than a bigger camera on my tripod would....
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Edited by Don: 11/09/2010 - 16:14
Mannesty
Posted 11/09/2010 - 21:47 Link
K10D wrote:
I apologise for this......Planet Earth? Locally Japan.

If you want it that bad, it's a flight away.
Japan is not local to me.

Get real. Just how many of the users here do you you think can afford a 645D, a crop of lenses to go with it, and the return air fair to go and fetch one?

The only member here that I know has one lives in Japan, so when it breaks he can get it repaired relatively easily. The same would not be true if we followed your suggestion of flying to Japan and bringing one back to UK.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Edited by Mannesty: 11/09/2010 - 21:50
K10D
Posted 12/09/2010 - 03:41 Link
I was not intending to get into "who can afford what" discussions.

As for "when it breaks"? I would say "if".

People do go to Japan for holidays or business trips and also have colleagues or friends that work there so it's not an impossible issue. How many people regularly go to the USA on holiday and buy otherwise expensive camera kit?

Agreed, the jump on a flight specifically for the purchase in Japan of a 645D is very unlikely to happen but I do know people who fly to Japan from the Gulf to buy their Canon cameras and lenses.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
chris_jl
Posted 12/09/2010 - 18:57 Link
K10D wrote:

Agreed, the jump on a flight specifically for the purchase in Japan of a 645D is very unlikely to happen but I do know people who fly to Japan from the Gulf to buy their Canon cameras and lenses.
I have a friend in Japan who flies here regularly to see ballet in London and generally tries not to stay overnight. She's the only person I know who does weekend breaks on the other side of the planet .

C
thoughton
Posted 13/09/2010 - 10:57 Link
I would tend to agree with K10D here, if you're in the market for a £7000 camera which isn't available in the UK then a £500 return flight to Japan wouldn't be major deterrent.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 13/09/2010 - 10:58
K10D
Posted 13/09/2010 - 11:51 Link
Four or five years back, KLM had some really cheap return fares from Teesside airport (MME) to New York. The UK price of a Nikon 400mm f/2.8 meant that you could fly there, stay two nights at the Walcott Hotel (31st & 5th) and buy the lens from Adorama or B&H. After all of that, you still had the price of a night in the pub back in Blighty.

"The good old days"?

Regards
Too far from a shore.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo