Thanks for your comment. I'm well sorted on the bag front thanks. I have 2 x Tamrac Expedition 7X bags, 1 with my Macro kit, the other is in storage. I also have a Lowepro Vertex 100AW, which I love, and a Lowepro Fastpack 350 for around town. All of them back packs with waste belt and chest straps. I have 2 other shoulder bags and a slingshot bag for storage, I can't stand all that weight on one shoulder anymore, even If I carry just one body and lens. I know there are lighter bags available, but I'm happy with those that I have.

Ebay or Amazon would be my first choice.

I have 4 x D-BC90 chargers and whilst I rarely use more than 2 at a time I still need all of them to sell with the cameras that they belong to.

You might be lucky here if someone has had a catastrophic kit failure or had their gear stolen, but otherwise I'd try Ebay or Amazon.

OK, I appreciate your comments. Firstly, I have never considered myself to be 'Old'. Instead, I acknowledge the fact that my body's condition will not allow me to enjoy certain aspects of my lifestyle as I once did. EG, today I stepped up onto my terrace after getting my washing in and my knee gave way sending me sprawling, but unhurt, across the terrace. If I were thirty-five going on fifteen I'd have laughed it off but there comes a time when we must face reality.
Yes, the OM-D E-M1X is heavy, but I mentioned I liked the specs, not that I was considering buying one. The E-M1 Mark I, II, or II would suffice from a spec point of view.

Quite honestly, I don't think Pentax has a future if it refuses to include the technologies that other manufacturers have implemented. EG: The OM-D E-M1 when launched did not have focus bracketing or focus stacking ability. Those functions were added later in firmware updates. None of the Pentax cameras I have ever owned has had new features, other than enabling new lenses to work, added in firmware. Bug fixes, yes, new features, no. Why not?

I love my Pentax gear but the company that produces it has blinkered vision and creates cameras that they like to make, not what their consumers want. The K-3 Mk III is a case in point. Why the hell did the think a camera without even a tilting screen would be popular? No thanks. time to move on I think.

. . . I'm considering changing to Micro 4/3rds (MFT) kit. Why shouldn't I, can you talk me out of it?

I've used Pentax kit exclusively since the 80's, I have a collection of 5 DSLR bodies (K20D, K-5, K-5 II, and 2 X K-3 II all with grips or L-Bracket) and more lenses than I ever use ranging from 12-24mm, to 150-500mm with no gaps in between + the trio of FA Limiteds, 31, 43, and 77mm. Frankly, I don't use most of them any more.

Now . . . I'm 72 years young next birthday, my knees and hips are playing up, I have 3 damaged vertebrae in my lower back, and my Pentax gear seems to get heavier the longer I keep it.

I've recently looked at Olympus and Panasonic MFT kit and quite like the specs of the Olympus OM-D EM1X and some Pro lenses as I'm more a stills 'tog tan vlogger, which is the direction Panasonic seems to be going.

I would always keep my K-3 II's and the lenses I use regularly (DA 12-24, DA* 16-50, 50-135, 60-250, Sigma 150-500mm, and my Macro lenses). All the primes will go though, I just don't use them.

So, why shouldn't I switch to MFT, or try it at least?

Very good thanks Peter, hope you and yours are well.

In all honesty, I really don't miss my old FA 135mm lens, but can't help having a bit of fun when it's mentioned.

I have very few primes now as my ability and enthusiasm to carry a bag full of them around with me has diminished somewhat in later years. I much prefer the versatility of zooms, and I have the DA* 50-135mm, Sigma 70-200mm, and the DA* 60-250 covering the 135mm focal length and I'm more than happy with the results from all three.

My walkabout bag nowadays contains only DA 12-24 1:4, DA* 16-50 1:2.8, and DA* 60-250mm 1:4, D-FA 100mm 1:2.8 macro lenses, one body, a National Geographic (made by Manfrotto) carbon fibre travel tripod, spare batteries, memory cards and not much else, yet I'm constantly thinking of ways to lighten the load

I've picked up a couple of K-3 II's from here over the last several months and looking forward to having some quality time with them in the very near future. They are quite an improvement over my K-5 II which was my most recent body before these. I don't have the desire to splash out £2K+ on new kit anymore, happy to pick up other's cast-offs at a fraction of their new price.

Keep safe and well amigo.

Sincere apologies to Lennybloke, didn't mean to hijack your for sale thread.

Grrrrr . . .

Excellent set, well done.

I used to do a lot of photography for a local short track oval racing club and I used my K-5 II together with a Sigma 70-200mm 1:2.8 which had its IS set to mode 2, (Panning)

Question: Would the K-3 III's SR Panning mode have been any use in this situation?

I just read that it is meant for slow moving objects, but at the same time, depending on your camera to subject distance, you could be panning quite slowly.

I sent you a PM.

The AF-160 to D-FA 100mm Macro lens adapter does not attach to the 49mm filter thread, it attaches in the same way as the lens hood.

They haven't, this update is for K-3 II and newer. The K-5 is unaffected.