Mannesty

Joined: 17th February 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mannesty
beakynet wrote:

2) Fixing white balance may give you some issues, I would use a grey card and take a propper custom white balance reading for each shot. Or ensure that the grey card is included in the shot to allow for tuning of the white balance during post processing/RAW development. Without this, you will be guessing the Kelvin light value through the rear LCD!
Doing so would negate any colour temperature differences between the street lighting and render them looking all the same, similar to AWB. I don't think that is the objective of this particular exercise.

Taking a grey card reading in daylight and using that same WB for all of the street lighting exposures would be appropriate though.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Photographing street lighting at 05/10/2012 - 12:49

Mannesty
AWB is a definite no-no in this situation if you want to compare the effects of the different colour temperatures of the various lights. AWB will try and make them all look the same.

Use daylight or cloudy WB setting.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Photographing street lighting at 04/10/2012 - 22:14

Mannesty
Chris, you have a PM.

Comment by Mannesty posted on As promised.... Some offers! at 04/10/2012 - 22:11

Mannesty
fritzthedog wrote:
. . . I do have a boxed 70-200 f/4 if that would be of any interest . . .
The Pentax-A 70-200mm lens is one of Pentax's budget offerings and as such, it lacks the SMC coating.

Comment by Mannesty posted on wanted lens at 03/10/2012 - 21:38

Mannesty
I don't know any of the books you mention, but I would always choose Martin Evening's books before Scott Kelby's. I just don't like his writing style.

Also, there are plenty of Lightroom users here, just ask.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Lightroom3 Guidebook - Choice of 3 titles at 03/10/2012 - 20:02

Mannesty
I've just downloaded the latest update to Lightroom 4 which is version 4.2

When I copied it to my software storage folder I noticed that I still had a copy of the Lightroom 3.6 update.

Lightroom 3.6 was 242,946Kb, Lightroom 4.2 is 769,437Kb, more than 3 times the size of V3.6

Now I know they've added a few modules like maps, and books (which I don't think many people use), but really, why so huge a jump in size?

EDIT: I may have answered the question myself. I'm assuming that the latest download has both 32 bit and 64 bit versions of Lightroom 4 which might account for its size.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Adobe Lightroom 4 - Bloatware? at 03/10/2012 - 11:27

Mannesty
I use FreeFileSynch. It works for me.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Backup Programs for Photos at 01/10/2012 - 12:01

Mannesty
SnoozeMoose wrote:
I did however also notice 4 small dots on the sensor, dust specs or not, I dunno. They are a bit a part, and 'glued' on, because a little bit of wind wasn't able to get them moving.
They are probably pollen grains, which are sticky.
An Arctic Butterfly might remove them, but the pollen may also stick to the brush. Best to use a wet solution, PecPads and Eclipse fluid should shift them but it can take a bit of practice getting the sensor smear free.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Issues with DA* 16-50 at 30/09/2012 - 19:20

Mannesty
fatspider wrote:
Try TAv Bob, you have control over all three values with just the two control dials and you can see just what is set to what in the viewfinder.
Surely, in TAv mode, ISO is the only variable and is allowed to float. It's only fixed at exposure time. Aperture and shutter speeds are fixed by the two dials.

If you want full control over all three (T, A, & ISO), you'll need to use manual

Comment by Mannesty posted on k-5 randomly choosing ISO at 22/09/2012 - 07:54

Mannesty
RIP Tony.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Very sad news at 17/09/2012 - 07:14

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo