PLUS

Lubbyman

Joined: 28th March 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Lubbyman
LennyBloke wrote:
davidwozhere wrote:
Ouch! I just looked up the A*300. Now I know why you still have it!
Optically there is no reason to part with it, but the biceps have been trying to tell me it's time for it to go
No need to sell the A* if you sell the F* or FA* and use the money to buy a gym membership.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Pentax 300mm thin out at 13/06/2024 - 10:15

Lubbyman
An excellent set. There's something about it that makes me think of the Full Monty . Nice to know that there are still parts of Sheffield that Mrs L would recognise (she grew up in the area, moved to the soft south before the steel works and coal mines were converted to shopping malls, housing estates and nature reserves).

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Sheffield's Industrial Past at 09/06/2024 - 19:07

Lubbyman
You could challenge them as to why they deem it to be the result of accidental damage or misuse. If they cannot give a good reason and are simply hiding behind the exclusion in the T&Cs, then it is at least aguable that the exclusion is legally an unfair contract term and therefore not enforcable. Office of Fair Trading guidance (link) makes it quite clear that exclusion terms cannot be used by a company to wriggle out of their legal obligations re sale of goods and services. I've won one or two battles with companies and other organisations (including when an item failed and the vendor tried to blame it on me) after I pointed out their legal obligations and challenged them to explain how they were complying. Your local Trading Standards or Citizens Advice should be able to advise.

Good luck.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on mpb.com at 07/06/2024 - 09:12

Lubbyman
An excellent set. I'd crop out the OOF blob at the bottom left of No. 1, but apart from that I can't think of any way they could be improved .

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on The past week... at 02/06/2024 - 18:39

Lubbyman
A truly beautiful photograph. Light, composition, atmosphere spot on. So simple, so subtle - and so difficult to achieve in practice.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Foggy Sunrise at Parkhouse Hill, Peak District National Park at 30/05/2024 - 09:51

Lubbyman
I'll find out next Monday, when we'll be spending the evening in a pub. He'll no doubt be putting the weight back on .

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Another pointless thread at 30/05/2024 - 09:46

Lubbyman
A friend has just lost 2Kg on a 5 day package tour to Spain. His wife clocked 20,000 steps in one day dragging him round tourist traps. Not the cheapest way of losing weight, though.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Another pointless thread at 29/05/2024 - 15:48

Lubbyman
pschlute wrote:
LennyBloke wrote:

Where do you get all these lenses from
I think we all know the answer to that !
And very reasonably priced, too .

pschlute wrote:
If you have not used many older manual focus lenses before, I would suggest for accurate focussing, use LV zoomed to 100% (need a tripod)
Good suggestion. Viewfinder focus with the M 200mm seemed much more tricky than with the (manual focus) Irix 150mm macro. I put it down to f4 rather than f2.8 but perhaps ergonomics comes into it, too - the focus ring on the Irix has always been my all time favourite .

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on M 200mm f4 around the garden at 25/05/2024 - 13:47

Lubbyman
LennyBloke wrote:
Where do you get all these lenses from
Not all of them...

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on M 200mm f4 around the garden at 23/05/2024 - 15:40

Lubbyman
Thanks folks. It's my first and only pre-A lens so an interesting experiece for me. It won't be replacing any of my other lenses for plant and flower photography, though - not least because MF with an f4 lens and my eyesight is a bit of a challenge!

HarisF1 wrote:
1 is a little flat
Indeed. I took several shots both before and after the rain, none of them seemed quite right and I couldn't fix it in post processing. Couldn't make out whether it was due to the flat light, the lens, camera settings or the user.

davidwozhere wrote:
You get along with it very well as these shots clearly demonstrate!
A bit of an exaggeration there - you haven't seen the ones that I'd rather people didn't see ...

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on M 200mm f4 around the garden at 23/05/2024 - 13:28

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo