All Forum Comments
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Trio of Trees (re-works) at 03/06/2020 - 11:06
Seriously, though, the Q is a totally different experience to a DSLR. Best to look at it as something different rather than a substitute. I've got a Q and Q-S1, both get used as well as the K3. The little 'uns are easy to carry around 'just in case' and less intrusive when I don't want to be conspicuous.
The original Q is very well built and feels reassuringly solid. Later models have more plastic and don't feel as robust. If it's the original Q, don't expect to get away with high ISO, it's a tiny sensor (ISO 400 is my limit and can still be a bit noisy). Later versions use a bigger sensor (ISO 800 on my Q-S1 is OK for me). You'll miss a viewfinder and the screen can be a pain in bright light (or if your eyesight isn't good!).
The 01 standard lens is very good. Wide open, you can get some worthwhile OOF blur, but nothing like a DSLR with a fast normal lens. The 02 is much better than some reviews suggest. The 06 tele-zoom is also very good (although mine recently packed up, still waiting to hear whether it's repairable ). The fisheye is fun, if you like that sort of thing. Worth noting that f8 is the limit with the Q for sharp images, diffusion sets in beyond that. However, the ND filters built into some Q lenses are a big help with bright light.
Is it an outdated system? Depends who you ask and what you mean by outdated. Nothing new in the Q series for several years and not likely to be any in the future, and it does have a small sensor. But if it does what you want (which it does for me) and you can get the lenses you want, then it's a viable system.
Hope that helps.
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Pentax Q at 02/06/2020 - 22:42
Well captured, you may not be saying " Ah Cute " when he's after your chips in a few months time
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on First Steps for Mum (or Dad?)... at 02/06/2020 - 15:46
Whatever you think about herring gulls, their UK conservation status is 'Red' so another young 'un ought to be a welcome sight. So enjoy saying "Ah, cute!" with a clear conscience!
1.

2.

Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on First Steps for Mum (or Dad?)... at 01/06/2020 - 19:46
The strong sunlight directly at my right meant that it was a foggy blur (I wear glasses).
Have you tried a right-angle finder in those situations? Looking downwards rather than forwards can sometimes be enough to get rid of blur from the sun. Not always possible, of course, but it's a trick that might help when live view and eye-to-viewfinder don't work. (I've also found that cleaning muck off glasses can help...)
You're fortunate to be able to grow roses like that. Wrong sort of soil round here, roses are a lot of bother and not much to show for it .
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Flower shot with the M* 300mm f4 at 01/06/2020 - 11:21
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Bee prepared at 01/06/2020 - 11:07
For all I know about plants 7 could be something common, but I've never seen anything like it before - is it imported from Chernobyl?
or its the first sign of a Coronavirus infected flower!
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Dusting off the DFA 28-105 at 31/05/2020 - 13:57
... a couple of walks around the Wimbledon Common area last week.
Amazing that those shots were taken in a densely populated part of a big city. And at a time when crowds have started to fill open spaces again after the pressure of lockdown. Where are the people????
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Bouncing Back at 31/05/2020 - 12:29
K3 + that great portrait lens the DA*300 + 1.4TC. Anything shorter and she notices you're there and the opportunity has gone!

Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Just Woken Up at 31/05/2020 - 11:17


ps ...anyone spot the spaniel in image number 2 ?
Steve