loskeran

Joined: 8th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

loskeran
chirpy wrote:
Unfortunately, this is very typical for Sigma and their flashes. It's the main reason I didn't go with their ring flash and now have the AF160FC in my grubby mitts
Ok don't rub it in, I have a limited budget and buy what i can afford, We pensioners do not have unlimited funds.
And remember it’s not what you have got, it is what you do with it that counts.

Comment by loskeran posted on Sigma Ring flash compatability at 13/02/2009 - 17:01

loskeran
Mike-P wrote:
loskeran wrote:

Ps. why do I always get the Duff one?
I thought at first that maybe it was a mind thing that you always get sent faulty goods but I'm beginning to think differently now .. someone certainly seems to have it in for you

loskeran wrote:

Guess what, the first batch that came out will only work properly on the K10’s not the later K200 or K20?
£50 cash via Paypal?
One word for that Mike "Horliks"

Comment by loskeran posted on Sigma Ring flash compatability at 13/02/2009 - 15:52

loskeran
I have been trying out my new Sigma Ring flash EM-140DG P-ttl Fitted to my K20 and then my K200 cameras and found it under exposing very badly.
I phoned SRS and talked to Nicky about it, she gave me the number for Sigma.
Guess what, the first batch that came out will only work properly on the K10’s not the later K200 or K20?
So if you have one of these working on a K10 and maybe want to use it on a K20 later contact Sigma for a re-chip, this is free.
I am told all the flashes after the price rise are now ok.
Ps. why do I always get the Duff one?

Comment by loskeran posted on Sigma Ring flash compatability at 13/02/2009 - 15:09

loskeran
MattMatic wrote:
IIRC, Pentax "piggybacked" on their then-distributor (can't remember their name off hand :blush - so they had a presence (if almost insignificant).
Matt
Intro 20-20 is the name you are looking for.
Tamron are there with a stand on their own as well.

Comment by loskeran posted on Focus on Imaging 09 Pentax at 13/02/2009 - 13:01

loskeran
One for Microlight,
If you want a longer lens for your K100 that will work on AF try a Sigma 400mm f5.6 prime lens, the APO version is very rare, but does come up for sale but commands a high price
I have got one of the 400mm Auto Focus ones.
I am also thinking of selling it, I maybe open to Good offers not silly ones.
ps in my gallery the helecopter shot done with this lens.

Comment by loskeran posted on Sigma 120-400mm at 13/02/2009 - 08:12

loskeran
microlight wrote:
Thanks for the responses , can We assume then that the K200D will work with these Sigma lenses ?

Marvellous isn't that you can go and purchase cameras manufactured by the opposition and use lenses straight out of the box.

Its all very well Pentax having a reputation for their cameras being backwards compatible .... wouldn't mind them being a little bit future proof....

I've had ME Super / Program A / Super A /MZ5N /K100D so it shows how loyal I am , makes you wonder about swopping sometimes though
Loyalty from other manufacturers, back ward and forward compatible with lenses etc?
I believe Pentax is the only one major producer has more forward/ backward compatibility
Than all the others put together.
Do some research and you will come to that conclusion.
Yes the K200 D works with SDM/HSM & any other lenses, also a thing to remember is until quite recently Sigma did not produce an HSM lens for Pentax fit, well after the K100d was first made.
Nikon D40/X will only work on auto with internal motor driven lenses as the D60.
Canon EOS fit lenses were a nightmare, you had to send Sigma and others to be re chipped to make them work .
So when it comes to Pentax they are the best for me, and I am not just saying that because I have and use Pentax.
I did change from Nikon.

Comment by loskeran posted on Sigma 120-400mm at 13/02/2009 - 07:59

loskeran
iceblinker wrote:
£88 a set? That's not cheap if they don't last long.
A set for which printer?
My 285 Under £30 and the R1400 A3 printed under £40 those 2 prices can be got at any time,I have had a set for the 285 for £17 & one for the R1400 £22, any of the -85 series will give you top colour prints of competition quality.
Unless you want to do loads of mono prints forget the printers with multiple blacks.

Comment by loskeran posted on Inkjet Printer for Photos at 13/02/2009 - 07:26

loskeran
iceblinker wrote:
I might have to forget the whole idea if I can only use genuine cartridges and ink for decent results

Specifically I interested in opinions on the CISS system rather than simply using alternative ordinary compatible cartridges.
If you want the best results stick to the Epson carts,
with the print head Nozzles / jets being so minute any dust etc will block, you can buy cheap ciss systems on ebay, but I would not recommend it.
You can buy cheap genuine Epson carts on Ebay.

Comment by loskeran posted on Inkjet Printer for Photos at 12/02/2009 - 22:28

loskeran
The latest share prices and comment for Jessops.
http://www.lse.co.uk/SharePrice.asp?shareprice=JSP

Comment by loskeran posted on Jessops- again... at 12/02/2009 - 21:58

loskeran
iceblinker wrote:
Any views on the CISS systems and third-party inks for the Epson R800?

Do they really work as well as the original cartridges? Any danger of buggering up the printer?
I learnt that lesson with the Epson R800, With so called top quality “compatibles” I binned it in the end
So now I only use genuine cartridges in my 3 Epson’s no more head cleaning and top quality prints.

Comment by loskeran posted on Inkjet Printer for Photos at 12/02/2009 - 21:14

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo